Effects of processing parameters on physical properties of the silicone maxillofacial prosthetic materials

Dental Materials

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 450-455

  Lai, J H ^a   Hodges, J S ^b  

^a LAI Laboratories Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

ANOVA; Calcium sulfate hemihydrate; Maxillofacial prostheses

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM SULFATE; SILASTIC; STAINLESS STEEL;

ADHESION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; ELASTICITY; HARDNESS; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROSTHESIS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ADHESIVENESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CALCIUM SULFATE; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; DENTAL MODELS; ELASTICITY; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; STAINLESS STEEL; TECHNOLOGY, DENTAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0033222866     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00074-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Todd L. Comparison of techniques for reinforcing stone molds used to construct facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:297-301.
2. Andres CJ, Haug SP, Brown DT, Bernal G. Effects of environmental factors on maxillofacial elastomers: part II - report of survey. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:519-522.
3. Polyzois GL. Evaluation of a new silicone elastomer for maxillofacial prostheses. J Prosthod 1995;4:38-41.
4. Andres CJ, Haug SP, Munoz CA, Bernal G. Effects of environmental factors on maxillofacial elastomers: part I - literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:327-330.
5. Sanchez RA, Moore DJ, Cruz DL, Chappell R. Comparison of the physical properties of two types of polydimethylsiloxane for fabrication of facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:679-682.
6. Dootz ER, Koran III A, Craig RG. Physical properties of three maxillofacial materials as a function of accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:379-383.
7. Haug SP, Andres CJ, Munoz CA, Okamura M. Effects of environmental factors on maxillofacial elastomers: Part III - physical properties. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:644-651.
8. Silastic MDX4-4210 Medical grade elastomer, Dow Corning Corp., Midland, Michigan 48686, 1988.
9. ASTM designation: D2240-86, Standard test method for rubber property - durometer hardness.
10. ASTM designation: D412-92, Standard test method for rubber property in tension.
11. ASTM designation: D624-91, Standard test method for tear strength of conventional vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers.
12. ASTM designation: D903-93, Standard test method for peel or stripping strength of adhesive bonds.
13. Haug SP, Richard GE, Margiotti E, Winkler MM, Moore DJ. An in vivo evaluation of adhesives used in extraoral maxillofacial prostheses. J Prosthod 1995;4:11-15.
14. Scheffe H. The analysis of variance. New York, 1959.
15. SAS Institute. JMP [Statistical software], version 3.1. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, Inc. (1994).
16. Thomas DR. Crosslinking of polydimethylsiloxanes. In: Clarson SJ, Semlyen JA, editors. Siloxane polymers, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PTR Prentice Hall, 1993. pp. 567.
17. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials, St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1985. pp. 491.
18. Philips RW. Science of dental materials, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1991. pp. 183-184.