Involving users in the specification of functionality using scenarios and model-based evaluation

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 455-466

  Van Schaik, Paul ^a  

^a TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EDUCATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMART CARDS;

MODEL BASED EVALUATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0033220808     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014492999118878     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. AJZEN, I. 1988, Attitudes, personality, and behavior (Chicago: Dorsey).
2. AJZEN, I. and FISHBEIN, M. 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
3. BAGOZZI, R. P., DAVIS, F. D. and WARSHAW, P. R. 1992, Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45 (7), 659-686.
4. BAMBERG, S. and SCHMIDT, P. 1993, Choosing between means of transportation: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 24, 25-37.
5. CARD, S. K., MORAN, T. P and NEWELL, A. 1983, The psychology of human-computer interaction. (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).
6. CARROLL, J. M. 1992, Making use a design representation. Internal report RC 19287 (79613). IBM Research Division (Yorktown Heights, NY: T. J. Watson Research Center).
7. CARROLL, J. M. and ROSSON, M. B. 1992, Getting around the task-artefact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10 (2), 181-212.
8. CONNER, M. and SPARKS, P. 1996, The theory of planned behaviour and health behaviours, in M. Conner and P. Sparks (eds), Predicting health behaviour (Buckingham: Open University Press), pp. 121-162.
9. DAMODARAN, L. 1996, User involvement in the systems design process: a practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15 (6), 363-377.
10. DAVIS, F. D. 1989, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, September, 318-340.
11. DAVIS, F. D. 1993, User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man - Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.
12. DAVIS, F. D., BAGOZZI, R. P. and WARSHAW, P. R. 1989, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35 (8), 982-1003.
13. DAVIS, F. D., BAGOZZI, R. P. and WARSHAW, P. R. 1992, Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 111-1132.
14. EASON, K. 1988. Information technology and organisational change (Taylor and Francis: London).
15. GEFEN, D. and STRAUB, D. W. 1997, Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, December, 389-400.
16. HENRY, J. W. and STONE, R. W. 1995, A structural equation model of job performance using a computer-based order entry system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 14 (3), 163-173.
17. HUBONA, G. S. 1996, Evaluating system design features. International Journal of Human - Computer Studies, 44, 93-118.
18. HUBONA, G. S. and CHENEY, P. H. 1994, System effectiveness of knowledge-based technology: the relationship of user performance and attitudinal measures, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (IEEE), pp. 532-541.
19. IGBARIA, M. 1993, User acceptance of microcomputer technology: an empirical test. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 21 (1), 73-90.
20. IGBARIA, M, SCHIFFMAN, S. J. and WIECKOWSKI, T. J. 1994, The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13 (6), 349-361.
21. JACKSON, C. M., CHOW, S. and LEITH, R. A. 1997, Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision Sciences, 28 (2), 357-389.
22. JOHNSON, P., JOHNSON, H. and RUSSELL, F. 1988, Collecting and generalising knowledge descriptions from task analysis data. ICL Technical Journal, 6, 137-155.
23. LEWIS, C. and RIEMAN, J. 1993, Getting to know users and their tasks. Task-centered user interface design. Chapter 2. (Self-published over the Internet).
24. NIELSEN, J. 1993, Usability engineering. (Boston: Academic Press).
25. PARÉ, G. and ELAM, J. J. 1995, Discretionary use of personal computers by knowledge workers: testing a social psychology model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 14 (4), 215-228.
26. ROGERS, W. A., CABRERA, E. F., WALKER, N., GILBERT, D. K. and FISK, A. D. 1996, A survey of automatic teller machine usage across the adult life span. Human Factors, 38 (1), 156-166.
27. SCHAIK, P. VAN and WHITE, T. N. 1993, Smart card project: first report; specification of functionality, part (i). Internal report. (Enschede, the Netherlands: University of Twente, Department of Ergonomics).
28. SCHAIK, P. VAN, WHITE, T. N. and PIETERS, A. 1993, Smart card project: second report; specification of functionality, part (ii) and user-related requirements. Internal report. (Enschede, the Netherlands: University of Twente, Department of Ergonomics).
29. SMITH, A. 1997, Human computer factors: a study of users and information systems (London: McGraw-Hill).
30. TELEMATICS RESEARCH CENTRE 1993, Chip cards: applications and opportunities (Alphen aan de Rijn: Samson).
31. ZOREDA, J. L. and OTON, J. M. 1994, Smart cards (Norwood, MA: Artech House).