Anisotropy in the extended haptic perception of longitudinal distances

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 1522-1536

  Barac Cikoja, Dragana ^a,b   Turvey, M T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TOUCH;

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION; STEREOGNOSIS; TOUCH;

EID: 0033219832     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03213115     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BAIRD, J. C., & BIERSDORF, W. R. (1967). Quantitative functions for size and distance judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 161-166.
2. BARAC-CIKOJA, D., & TURVEY, M. T. (1991). Perceiving aperture size by striking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 330-346.
3. BARAC-CIKOJA, D., & TURVEY, M. T. (1993). Haptically perceiving size at a distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 347-370.
4. BARAC-CIKOJA, D., & TURVEY, M. T. (1995). Does perceived size depend on perceived distance? An argument from extended haptic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 216-224.
5. BLUMENFELD, W. (1936). The relationship between the optical and haptic construction of space. Acta Psychologica, 2, 125-174.
6. BRADSHAW, J. L., BRADSHAW, J. A., & NETTLETON, N. C. (1988). Movement initiation and control: Abduction, adduction and locus of limb. Neuropsychologia, 26, 701-709.
7. BRADSHAW, J. L., BRADSHAW, J. A., & NETTLETON, N. C. (1989). Direction and location of movement in kinesthetic judgment of extent. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1139-1151.
8. BURTON, G. (1993). Non-neural extensions of haptic sensitivity. Ecological Psychology, 5, 105-124.
9. CARLTON, E. H., & SHEPARD, R. N. (1990). Psychologically simple motions as geodesic paths: I. Asymmetric objects. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34, 127-188.
10. DAY, R. H., & WONG, T. S. (1971). Radial and tangential movement directions as determinants of the haptic illusion in an L figure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 19-22.
11. DEN HARTOG, J. P. (1960). Mechanics. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1948)
12. GIBSON, J. J. (1959). Perception as a function of stimulation. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 1, pp. 456-501). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. GIBSON, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14. GIBSON, J. J. (1979/1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15. LOOMIS, J. M., DA SILVA, J. A., FUJITA, N., & FUKUSIMA, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 906-921.
16. LUNEBURG, R. K. (1947). Mathematical analysis of binocular vision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. LUNEBURG, R. K. (1950). The metric of binocular visual space. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 40, 627-642.
18. MARCHETTI, F. M., & LEDERMAN, S. J. (1983). The haptic radial-tangential effect: Two tests of Wong's "moments-of-inertia" hypothesis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 43-46.
19. NORMAN, J. F., TODD, J. T., PEROTTI, V. J., & TITTLE, J. S. (1996). The visual perception of three-dimensional length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 173-186.
20. PAGANO, C. C., GARRETT, S., & TURVEY, M. T. (1996). Is limb proprioception a function of the limbs' eigenvectors? Ecological Psychology, 8, 43-69.
21. PAGANO, C. C., & TURVEY, M. T. (1995). The inertia tensor as a basis for the perception of limb orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1070-1087.
22. POULTON, E. C. (1974). Tracking skills and manual control. New York: Academic Press.
23. REED, E., & JONES, R. (1982). Reasons for realism: Selected essays of J. J. Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. REID, R. L. (1954). An illusion of movement complementary to the horizontal-vertical illusion. Quarterly Journal of Psychology, 6, 107-111.
25. THOMSON, J. A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception & Performance, 9, 427-443.
26. TURVEY, M. T. (1996). Dynamic touch. American Psychologist, 51, 1134-1152.
27. TURVEY, M. T., & CARELLO, C. (1995). Dynamic touch. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: V. Perception of space and motion (pp. 401-490). San Diego: Academic Press.
28. WAGNER, M. (1985). The metric of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 483-495.
29. WONG, T. S. (1977). Dynamic properties of radial and tangential movements as determinants of the haptic horizontal-vertical illusion with an L figure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 151-164.