New methods for solving the Rescorla - Wagner model

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 684-688

  Yamaguchi, Makoto ^a  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0033219328     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200746     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. CHAPMAN, G. B., & ROBBINS, S. I. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory & Cognition, 18, 537-545.
2. CHENG, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367-405.
3. DICKINSON, A., & BURKE, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60-80.
4. GLUCK, M. A., & BOWER, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227-247.
5. HULL, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
6. KAMIN, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-296). New York: Appleton-Centrury-Crofts.
7. MELZ, E. R., CHENG, P. W., HOLYOAK, K. J., & WALDMANN, M. R. (1993). Cue interaction in human categorization: Contingency or the Rescorla-Wagner learning rule? Comments on Shanks (1991). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1398-1410.
8. MERCIER, P. (1996). Computer simulations of the Rescorla-Wagner and Pearce-Hall models in conditioning and contingency judgment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 55-60.
9. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
10. SHANKS, D. R. (1993). Associative versus contingency accounts of category learning: Reply to Melz, Cheng, Holyoak, and Waldmann (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1411-1423.
11. VAN HAMME, L. J., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning & Motivation, 25, 127-151.
12. WAGNER, A. R., LOGAN, F. A., HABERLANDT, K., & PRICE, T. (1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171-180.