Mechanism of stochastic resonance enhancement in neuronal models driven by [formula presented] noise

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 4637-4644

  Nozaki, Daichi ^a,b   Collins, James J ^b   Yamamoto, Yoshiharu ^c  

^a NATIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES   (Japan)

^b Boston University College of Engineering   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOPHYSICS; METABOLISM; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; BIOPHYSICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEURONS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 0033215676     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.4637     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. F. Moss, D. Pierson, and D. O’Gorman, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 4, 1383 (1994)
2. K. Wiesenfeld and F. Moss, Nature (London) 373, 33 (1995)
3. A. R. Bulsara and L. Gammaitoni, Phys. Today 49(3), 39 (1996)
4. L. Gammaitoni, P. Hänggi, P. Jung, and F. Marchesoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1998).
5. R. Benzi, A. Sutera, and A. Vulpiani, J. Phys. A 14, L453 (1981)
6. C. Nicolis, Tellus 34, 1 (1982)
7. TellusR. Benzi, G. Parisi, A. Sutera, and A. Vulpiani, 34, 10 (1982)
8. S. Fauve and H. Heslot, Phys. Lett. 97A, 5 (1983).
9. B. McNamara, K. Wiesenfeld, and R. Roy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2626 (1988)
10. B. McNamara and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4854 (1989).
11. A. Longtin, A. Bulsara, and F. Moss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 656 (1991)
12. A. Longtin, J. Stat. Phys. 70, 309 (1993)
13. F. Moss , Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 706, 26 (1993)
14. K. Wiesenfeld , Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2125 (1994).
15. J. J. Collins, C. C. Chow, and T. T. Imhoff, Phys. Rev. E 52, R3321 (1995)
16. J. J. CollinsC. C. ChowT. T. ImhoffNature (London) 376, 236 (1995)
17. J. J. Collins, C. C. Chow, A. C. Capela, and T. T. Imhoff, Phys. Rev. E 54, 5575 (1996).
18. J. K. Douglass, L. Wilkens, E. Pantazelou, and F. Moss, Nature (London) 365, 337 (1993)
19. Nature (London)J. E. Levin and J. P. Miller, 380, 165 (1996)
20. Nature (London)P. Cordo , 383, 769 (1996)
21. Nature (London)J. J. Collins, T. T. Imhoff, and P. Grigg, 383, 770 (1996)
22. J. J. Collins, T. T. Imhoff, and P. Grigg, J. Neurophysiol. 76, 642 (1996)
23. R. P. Morse and E. F. Evans, Nature Med. 2, 928 (1996)
24. B. J. Gluckman , Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4098 (1996)
25. J. J. Collins, T. T. Imhoff, and P. Grigg, Phys. Rev. E 56, 923 (1997)
26. K. A. Richardson , Chaos 8, 599 (1998).
27. A. L. Goldberger, D. R. Rigney, and B. J. West, Sci. Am. 262, 34 (1990)
28. J. B. Bassingthwaighte, L. S. Lievovitch, and B. J. West, Fractal Physiology (Oxford University Press, New York, 1994).
29. M. C. Teich, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36, 150 (1989).
30. Y. Yamamoto and R. L. Hughson, Physica D 68, 250 (1993)
31. Y. YamamotoR. L. HughsonAm. J. Physiol. 266, R40 (1994)
32. Am. J. Physiol.Y. Yamamoto, J.-O. Fortrat, and R. L. Hughson, 269, H480 (1995)
33. Am. J. Physiol.Y. Yamamoto , 269, R830 (1995).
34. J. J. Collins and C. J. DeLuca, Exp. Brain Res. 95, 308 (1993)
35. J. J. CollinsC. J. DeLucaPhys. Rev. Lett. 73, 764 (1994)
36. J. M. Hausdorff , J. Appl. Physiol. 78, 349 (1995)
37. D. Nozaki, K. Nakazawa, and Y. Yamamoto, Exp. Brain Res. 105, 402 (1995)
38. Exp. Brain Res.D. NozakiK. NakazawaY. Yamamoto112, 112 (1996)
39. Y. Chen, M. Ding, and J. A. Kelso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4501 (1997).
40. L. B. Kiss , J. Stat. Phys. 70, 451 (1993).
41. Z. Gingl, L. B. Kiss, and F. Moss, Europhys. Lett. 29, 191 (1995).
42. D. Nozaki and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Lett. A 243, 281 (1998).
43. R. A. FitzHugh, Biophys. J. 1, 445 (1961)
44. J. Nagumo, S. Arimoto, and S. Yoshizawa, Proc. IRE 50, 2061 (1962).
45. In this study, we used Gaussian (Formula presented) noise (Formula presented) with zero mean and upper and lower limits on the frequency range. The (Formula presented) noise was generated by the spectrum-based method described in Ref. 13.
46. We used the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method for digital simulation (time step of 0.002 s; total time, 32.768 s). The impulse trains were convolved by a symmetric Hanning window (width = 6 s) to estimate (Formula presented), where the brackets (Formula presented) denote the ensemble average. The signal (Formula presented) was formed by convolving Gaussian white noise with the same window function.
47. H. A. Kramers, Physica 7, 284 (1940).
48. P. Hänggi, P. Jung, C. Zerbe, and F. Moss, J. Stat. Phys. 70, 25 (1993).
49. A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991).
50. S. O. Rice, in Selected Papers on Noise and Stochastic Processes, edited by N. Wax (Dover, New York, 1954).
51. D. Nozaki, D. J. Mar, P. Grigg, and J. J. Collins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2402 (1999).