|
Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 127-131
|
Is it better to leave or restore carious deciduous molar teeth? A preliminary study.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
DECIDUOUS TOOTH;
DENTAL CARE;
DENTAL CARIES;
DENTAL SURGERY;
GENERAL PRACTICE;
GINGIVA DISEASE;
HEALTH SURVEY;
HUMAN;
LONGITUDINAL STUDY;
METHODOLOGY;
MOLAR TOOTH;
PILOT STUDY;
PRESCHOOL CHILD;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RISK;
STATISTICAL MODEL;
STATISTICS;
TOOTH EXTRACTION;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
DENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN;
DENTAL CARIES;
DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT;
DENTIST'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
DMF INDEX;
ENGLAND;
GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL;
HUMANS;
LOGISTIC MODELS;
LONGITUDINAL STUDIES;
MOLAR;
ODDS RATIO;
PILOT PROJECTS;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TOOTH EXFOLIATION;
TOOTH EXTRACTION;
TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;
|
EID: 0033215576
PISSN: 13557610
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (21)
|
References (0)
|