What variety of attention is automatically captured by peripheral cues?

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 1424-1435

  Luck, Steven J ^a,b   Thomas, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; CUES; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033210554     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206191     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. CHEAL, M., & GREGORY, M. (1997). Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 51-71.
2. CHEAL, M. L., & LYON, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 859-880.
3. COHEN, A., & IVRY, R. B. (1989). Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 650-663.
4. COHEN, A., & IVRY, R. B. (1991). Density effects in conjunction search: Evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 891-901.
5. EGETH, H. E., & YANTIS, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
6. ERIKSEN, C. W., & HOFFMAN, J. E. (1974). Selective attention: Noise suppression or signal enhancement? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 587-589.
7. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
8. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 682-685.
9. GIESBRECHT, B. L., & DI LOLLO, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1454-1466.
10. HANDY, T. C., KINGSTONE, A., & MANGUN, G. R. (in press). Spatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency. Perception & Psychophysics.
11. HAWKINS, H. L., HILLYARD, S. A., LUCK, S. J., MOULOUA, M., DOWNING, C. J., & WOODWARD, D. P. (1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 802-811.
12. HAWKINS, H. L., SHAFTO, M. G., & RICHARDSON, K. (1988). Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 484-492.
13. HENDERSON, J. M. (1996). Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 780-787.
14. HENDERSON, J. M., & MACQUISTAN, A. D. (1993). The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 221-230.
15. HILLSTROM, A. P., & YANTIS, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 399-411.
16. JONIDES, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. KAHNEMAN, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. LAPPIN, J. S., & UTTAL, W. R. (1976). Does prior knowledge facilitate the detection of visual targets in random noise? Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 367-374.
19. LUCK, S. J. (1995). Multiple mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Recent evidence from human electrophysiology. Behavioural Brain Research, 71, 113-123.
20. LUCK, S. J., HILLYARD, S. A., MOULOUA, M., & HAWKINS, H. L. (1996). Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 725-737.
21. LUCK, S. J., HILLYARD, S. A., MOULOUA, M., WOLDORFF, M. G., CLARK, V. P., & HAWKINS, H. L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 887-904.
22. PALMER, J., AMES, C. T., & LINDSEY, D. T. (1993). Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 108-130.
23. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. REINITZ, M. T. (1990). Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 497-505.
25. SHAPIRO, K. L., & RAYMOND, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 151-188). San Diego: Academic Press.
26. SHAW, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 109-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. SHIU, L., & PASHLER, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1037-1054.
28. SPERLING, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74.
29. SPERLING, G., & DOSHER, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 2-65). New York: Wiley.
30. TASSINARI, G., AGLIOTI, S., CHELAZZI, L., PERU, A., & BERLUCCHI, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? Vision Research, 34, 179-189.
31. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 676-681.
32. YANTIS, S., & HILLSTROM, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 95-107.
33. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134.