Predicting color from gray: The relationship between achromatic adjustment and asymmetric matching

Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 2370-2376

  Speigle, Jon M ^a,b   Brainard, David H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SHARP LABORATORIES OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; COLOR; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 0033209917     PISSN: 10847529     EISSN: 15208532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.16.002370     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. H. Helson and W. C. Michels, “The effect of chromatic adaptation on achromaticity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38, 1025-1032 (1948).
2. R. W. G. Hunt and L. M. Winter, “Color adaptation in picture-viewing situations,” J. Phot. Sci. 23, 112-115 (1975).
3. J. S. Werner and J. Walraven, “Effect of chromatic adaptation on the achromatic locus: The role of contrast, luminance and background color,” Vision Res. 22, 929-944 (1982).
4. R. S. Berns and M. E. Gorzynski, “Simulating surface colors on CRT displays: The importance of cognitive clues,” in Proceedings of the AIC Conference: Colour and Light (Association Internationale de la Couleur, 1991), pp. 21-24.
5. M. D. Fairchild and P. Lennie, “Chromatic adaptation to natural and incandescent illuminants,” Vision Res. 32, 2077-2085 (1992).
6. K. H. Bauml, “Color appearance: Effects of illuminant changes under different surface collections,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 531-542 (1994).
7. D. H. Brainard and K. Ishigami, “Factors influencing the appearance of CRT colors,” in Proceedings of the IS&T/SID Color Imaging Conference: Color Science, Systems, and Applications (Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Springfield, Va., 1995), pp. 62-66.
8. E. J. Chichilnisky and B. A. Wandell, “Seeing gray through the on and off pathways,” Visual Neurosci. 13, 591-596 (1996).
9. D. H. Brainard, “Color constancy in the nearly natural image. 2. Achromatic loci,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 307-325 (1998).
10. H. Helson, “Fundamental problems in color vision. I. The principle governing changes in hue, saturation and lightness of non-selective samples in chromatic illumination,” J. Exp. Psychol. 23, 439-476 (1938).
11. H. Helson and V. B. Jeffers, “Fundamental problems in color vision. II. Hue, lightness, and saturation of selective samples in chromatic illumination,” J. Exp. Psychol. 26, 1-27 (1940).
12. J. J. McCann, S. P. McKee, and T. H. Taylor, “Quantitative studies in retinex theory: A comparison between theoretical predictions and observer responses to the ‘Color Mondrian’ experiments,” Vision Res. 16, 445-458 (1976).
13. L. E. Arend and A. Reeves, “Simultaneous color constancy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1743-1751 (1986).
14. A. Valberg and B. Lange-Malecki, “Mondrian complexity does not improve ‘color constancy’,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 28, 92 (1987).
15. D. H. Brainard and B. A. Wandell, “Asymmetric colormatching: How color appearance depends on the illuminant,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1433-1448 (1992).
16. M. P. Lucassen and J. Walraven, “Color constancy under natural and artificial illumination,” Vision Res. 36, 2699-2711 (1996).
17. D. H. Brainard, W. A. Brunt, and J. M. Speigle, “Color constancy in the nearly natural image. 1. Asymmetric matches,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2091-2110 (1997).
18. W. S. Stiles, “Mechanism concepts in colour theory,” J. Colour Group 11, 106-123 (1967).
19. J. M. Speigle and D. H. Brainard, “Luminosity thresholds: Effects of test chromaticity and ambient illumination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 436-451 (1996).
20. K. H. Bauml, “Illuminant changes under different surface collections: Examining some principles of color appearance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 261-271 (1995).
21. E. J. Chichilnisky and B. A. Wandell, “Photoreceptor sensitivity changes explain color appearance shifts induced by large uniform backgrounds in dichoptic matching,” Vision Res. 35, 239-254 (1995).
22. J. von Kries, “Chromatic adaptation” [originally published in Festschrift der Albrecht-Ludwigs-Universitat (Fribourg, Germany, 1902), pp. 145-148.] In Sources of Color Vision, L. D. MacAdam, ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970), pp. 109-126.
23. D. Jameson and L. M. Hurvich, “Theory of brightness and color contrast in human vision,” Vision Res. 4, 135-154 (1964).
24. J. Walraven, “Discounting the background: The missing link in the explanation of chromatic induction,” Vision Res. 16, 289-295 (1976).
25. S. K. Shevell, “The dual role of chromatic backgrounds in color perception,” Vision Res. 18, 1649-1661 (1978).
26. J. M. Speigle, “Testing whether a common representation explains the effects of viewing context on color appearance,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of California, Santa Barbara, Calif., 1997).
27. A goodness-of-fit test does indicate that the difference between full diagonal and alternating-fixation, achromatic constrained models is statistically significant (F-test for nested linear models applied to CIELAB E* errors; p, 0.05 for all observers.) This test, however, does not reflect prediction error induced by error in measurement of the achromatic loci.
28. J. M. Kraft and D. H. Brainard, “Mechanisms of color constancy under nearly natural viewing,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 307-312 (1999).
29. V. Smith and J. Pokorny, “Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm,” Vision Res. 15, 161-171 (1975).
30. P. DeMarco, J. Pokorny, and V. C. Smith, “Full-spectrum cone sensitivity functions for X-chromosome-linked anomalous trichromats,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1465-1476 (1992).