Do the global advantage and interference effects covary?

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 1308-1319

  Amirkhiabani, Gholamali ^a   Lovegrove, William J ^b  

^a CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TIME; VISION;

FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033209511     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206182     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. AMIRKHIABANI, G., & LOVEGROVE, W. J. (1996). Role of eccentricity and size in the global precedence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1434-1447.
2. ANTES, J. R., & MANN, S. W. (1984). Global-local precedence in picture processing. Psychological Research, 46, 247-259.
3. BOER, L. C., & KEUSS, P. J. G. (1982). Global precedence as a postperceptual effect: An analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff functions. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 358-366.
4. COHEN, T. E., & LASLEY, D. J. (1974). Detectability of a luminance increment: Effect of spatial uncertainty. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 64, 1715-1719.
5. CORNSWEET, T. N. (1970). Visual perception. New York: Academic Press.
6. DAVIS, E. T. (1981). Allocation of attention: Uncertainty effects when monitoring one or two visual gratings of noncontiguous spatial frequencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 618-622.
7. DAVIS, E. T., KRAMER, P., & GRAHAM, N. (1983). Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 20-28.
8. HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1981). On varying the span of visual attention: Evidence for two modes of spatial attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 17-30.
9. KINCHLA, R. A., & WOLFE, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: "Top-down," "bottom-up," or "middle-out." Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 225-231.
10. LABERGE, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 371-379.
11. LABERGE, D., & BROWN, V. (1986). Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 188-200.
12. LAMB, M. R., & ROBERTSON, L. C. (1988). The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 172-181.
13. LAMB, M. R., & ROBERTSON, L. C. (1989). Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global- and local-level information? Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 254-258.
14. NAVON, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
15. NAVON, D., & NORMAN, J. (1983). Does global precedence really depend on visual angle? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 955-965.
16. OSTERBERG, G. (1935). Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta Ophthalmologica, 6 (Suppl.), 11-97.
17. POLYAK, S. L. (1957). The vertebrate visual system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. POSNER, M. I., SNYDER, C. R., & DAVIDSON, B.-J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
19. SHAPLEY, R., & LENNIE, P. (1985). Spatial frequency analysis in the visual system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 8, 547-583.
20. SIMON, J. R., SLY, P. E., & VILAPAKKAM, S. (1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions toward the stimulus source. Acta Psychologica, 47, 63-81.