Dose-response effects of inactivated Newcastle disease vaccines: Influence of serologic assay, time after vaccination, and type of chickens

Avian Diseases

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 670-677

  Maas, R A ^a   Oei, H L ^a   Venema Kemper, S ^a   Koch, G ^a   Bongers, J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dose response; Inactivated; Newcastle disease; Serology; Vaccine

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; AVES; GALLUS GALLUS; NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS; PARAMYXOVIRIDAE;

EID: 0033208655     PISSN: 00052086     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1592736     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allan, W. H., and D. H. Thornton. The suitability of various challenge strains of Newcastle disease virus for use in potency tests of live and inactivated vaccine. J. Biol. Stand. 8:133-138. 1980.
2. Buonavoglia, C., A. Fioretti, M. Tollis, F. Menna, and V. Papparella. A preliminary vaccine potency trial of a Newcastle disease virus inactivated with binary ethylenimine. Vet. Res. Comm. 12:195-197. 1988.
3. Engel, G., and W. G. Buist. Analysis of a generalized linar mixed model; a case study and simulation results. Biom. J. 38:61-80. 1996.
4. Engel, G., and A. Keen. A simple approach for the analysis of generalized linear mixed models. Stat. Neerlandica 48:1-22. 1994.
5. European Pharmacopoeia, 3rd Ed. European Department for the Quality of Medicines within the Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France. Monograph 1997:0870. 1997.
6. Goddard, R. D., R. A. J. Nicholas, and P. R. Luff. Serology-based potency test for inactivated Newcastle disease vaccines. Vaccine 6:530-532. 1988.
7. Heller, E. D., and Z. Uni. Serological evidence for major histocompatibility complex (B complex) antigens in broilers selected for humoral immune response. Poult. Sci. 70:726-732. 1991.
8. King, D. J. Serological profiles of commercial broiler breeders and their progeny. 2. Newcastle disease virus. Avian Dis. 30:724-727. 1986.
9. Klasing, K. C. Influence of acute feed deprivation or excess feed intake on immunocompetence of broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 67:626-634. 1988.
10. Maas, R. A., H. L. Oei, S. Kemper, G. Koch, and L. Visser. The use of homologous virus in the haemagglutination-inhibition assay after vaccination with Newcastle disease virus strain La Sota or Clone30 leads to an overestimation of protective serum antibody titers. Avian Pathol. 27:625-631. 1998.
11. Maatman, R., W. B. Gross, E. A. Dunnington, A. S. Larsen, and P. B. Siegel. Growth, immune response and behavior of broiler and leghorn cockerels fed different methionine levels. Arch. Gefluegelkd. 57:249-256. 1993.
12. McCullagh, P. and J. A. Neider. Generalized linear models, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London, England. 1989.
13. Miller, L. L., P. B. Siegel, and E. A. Dunnington. Inheritance of antibody response to sheep erythrocytes in lines of chickens divergently selected for fifrysix-day body weight. Poult. Sci. 71:47-52. 1992.
14. Montgomery, R. D., P. Villegas, D. L. Dawe, and J. Brown. Effect of avian reoviruses on lymphoid organ weights and antibody response in chickens. Avian Dis. 29:552-560. 1985.
15. Parmentier, H. K., M. G. B. Nieuwland, E. Rijke, G. De Vries, and J. W. Schrama. Divergent antibody responses to vaccines and divergent body weights of chicken lines selected for high and low humoral responsiveness to sheep red blood cells. Avian Dis. 40:634-644. 1996.
16. Pay, T. W. F., and P. J. Hingley. Correlation of 140S antigen dose with the serum neutralizing antibody response and the level of protection induced in cattle by foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Vaccine 5:60-64. 1987.
17. Smith, A. L., G. H. Tignor, K. Mifune, and T. Motohashi. Isolation and assay of rabies serogroup viruses in CER cells. Intervirology 8:92-99. 1977.
18. Stone, H. D., M. Brugh, G. A. Erickson, and C. W. Beard. Evaluation of inactivated Newcastle disease oil-emulsion vaccines. Avian Dis. 1:99-111. 1980.
19. Stone, H. D. Optimization of hydrophile-lipophile balance for improved efficacy of Newcastle disease and avian influenza oil-emulsion vaccines. Avian Dis. 32:68-73. 1988.
20. Thayer, S. G., C. S. Eidson, and S. H. Kleven. Multivalent inactivated virus oil emulsion vaccines in broiler breeder chickens. I. Newcastle disease virus and infectious bursal disease virus bivalent vaccines. Poult. Sci. 62:1978-1997. 1983.
21. Toro, H., E. Reyes, T. Redmann, and E. F. Kaleta. Local and systemic specific antibody response of different chicken lines after ocular vaccination against infectious bronchitis. J. Vet. Med. B 43:449-454. 1996.
22. van Eck, J. H. H. Immunity to Newcastle disease in fowl of different breeds, primarily vaccinated with commercial inactivated oil-emulsion vaccines: a laboratory experiment. Vet. Q. 9:296-303. 1987.
23. van der Zijp, A. J. The effect of genetic origin, source of antigen, and dose of antigen on the immune response of cockerels. Poult. Sci. 62:205-211. 1983.
24. Villegas, P., G. M. Pesti, and D. Pesti. Antibody response against Newcastle disease in commercial broilers fed different dietary protein levels. Poult. Sci. 62:277-281. 1983.
25. Westbury, H. A. Comparison of the immunogenicity of Newcastle disease virus strains V4, Hitchner B1 and La Sota in chickens. 1. Tests in susceptible chickens. Aust. Vet. J. 61:5-9. 1984.
26. Wyatt, C. L., W. D. Weaver, Jr., W. L. Beane, and D. M. Denbow. Influence of hatcher holding times on several physiological parameters associated with the immune system of chickens. Poult. Sci. 65: 2156-2164. 1986.