On rule interestingness measures

Knowledge-Based Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 5-6, 1999, Pages 309-315

  Freitas, A A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE TECNOLÓGICA FEDERAL DO PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA MINING; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

RULE INTERESTINGNESS; RULE SUPRISINGNESS;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 0033207925     PISSN: 09507051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-7051(99)00019-2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fayyad U.M., Piatetsky-Shapiro G. From data mining to knowledge discovery: an overview. Fayyad U.M., Piatetsky-Shapiro G., Smyth P., Uthurusamy R. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1996;1 AAAI/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. B. Liu, W. Hsu, S. Chen, Using general impressions to analyze discovered classification rules. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI, 1997, pp. 31-36.
3. Piatetsky-Shapiro G. Discovery, analysis and presentation of strong rules. Piatetsky-Shapiro G., Frawley W.J. Knowledge Discovery in Databases. 1991;229 AAAI.
4. J.A. Major, J.J. Mangano, Selecting among rules induced from a hurricane database. Proc. AAAI-93 Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, July 1993, pp. 28-44.
5. M. Kamber, R. Shinghal, Evaluating the interestingness of characteristic rules. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI, 1996, pp. 263-266.
6. R.C. Holte, L.E. Acker, B.W. Porter, Concept learning and the problem of small disjuncts, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on AI (IJCAI-89), pp. 813-818.
7. A.P. Danyluk, F.J. Provost, Small disjuncts in action: learning to diagnose errors in the local loop of the telephone network, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1993, pp. 81-88.
8. K.M. Ting, The problem of small disjuncts: its remedy in decision trees, Proceedings of the 10th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1994, pp. 91-97.
9. Information-based evaluation criterion for classifier's performance, Machine Learning 6 (1991) 67-80.
10. Quinlan J.R. Improved estimates for the accuracy of small disjuncts. Machine Learning. 6:(1):1900;93-98.
11. M. Kubat, S. Matwin, Addressing the curse of imbalanced training sets: one-sided selection, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning,. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, 1997, pp. 179-186.
12. Nunez M. The use of background knowledge in decision tree induction. Machine Learning. 6:1900;231-250.
13. Tan M. Cost-sensitive learning of classification knowledge and its application in robotics. Machine Learning. 13:1993;7-33.
14. Turney P.D. Cost-sensitive classification: empirical evaluation of a hybrid genetic decision tree induction algorithm. Journal of Artificial Intelligent Research. 2:1995;369-409.
15. F. Provost, T. Fawcett., Analysis and visualization of classifier performance: comparison under imprecise class and cost distributions, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,. AAAI, 1997, pp. 43-48.
16. H. Roberts, M. Denby, K. Totton, Accounting for misclassification costs in decision tree classifiers, Proceedings of the Intelligent Data Analysis Conference (IDA-95), 1995.
17. Michie D., Spiegelhalter D.J., Taylor C.C. Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification. 1994;Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK.
18. Breiman L., Friedman J.H., Olshen R.A., Stone C.J. Classification and Regression Trees. 1984;Wadsworth, Pacific Groves, CA.
19. Glymour C., Madigan D., Pregibon D., Smyth P. Statistical themes and lessons for data mining. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 1:(1):1997;11-28.
20. C. Schaffer, A conservation law for generalization performance, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1994, pp. 259-265.
21. R.B. Rao, D. Gordon, W. Spears, For every generalization action, is there really an equal and opposite reaction? Analysis of the conservation law for generalization performance, Proceedings 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1995, pp. 471-479.
22. Gebhardt F. Choosing among competing generalizations. Knowledge Acquisition. 3:1991;361-380.
23. Major J.A., Mangano J.J. Selecting among rules induced from a hurricane database. Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems. 4:(1):1995;39-52.