Synergisms among land use, transit, and travel pricing policies

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1670, 1999, Pages 3-7

  Johnston, Robert A ^a   Rodier, Caroline J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXHAUST GASES; GAS EMISSIONS; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TRANSPORTATION CHARGES;

TRAVEL MODEL; TRAVELER WELFARE MODEL;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 0033207523     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1670-01     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Johnston, R. A., and R. Ceerla. Land Use and Transportation Alternatives. Transportation and Energy: Strategies for a Sustainable Transportation System (D. Sperling and S. Shaheen, ed.). American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C., 1995.
2. Towards Sustainable Transportation: The Vancouver Conference. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1997.
3. Holtzclaw, J. Using Residential Patterns and Transit to Decrease Auto Dependence and Costs. Natural Resources Defense Council testimony before the California Energy Commission, June 1994.
4. Ewing, R., P. Haliyur, and G. W. Page. Getting Around a Traditional City, A Suburban Planned Unit Development, and Everything In Between. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 53-62.
5. Nowlan, D. M., and G. Stewart. Downtown Population Growth and Commuting Trips: Recent Experience in Toronto. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 57, 1991, pp. 165-182.
6. Frank, L. D., and G. Pivo. Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, Walking. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 44-52.
7. Dunphy, R. T., and K. Fisher. Transportation, Congestion, and Density: New Insights. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 89-96.
8. Cervero, R. Land-Use Mixing and Suburban Mobility. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 42, 1988, pp. 429-446.
9. Cervero, R. Transit-Based Housing in California: Evidence on Ridership Impacts. Transport Policy, Vol. 1, 1994, pp. 174-183.
10. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. TCRP Report 16: Transit and Urban Form. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996.
11. JHK and Associates. Transportation-Related Land Use Strategies To Minimize Motor Vehicle Emissions: An Indirect Source Research Study. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, June 1995.
12. Breheny, M. J. The Contradictions of the Compact City: A Review. Sustainable Development and Urban Form (M. J. Breheny, ed.). Pion, London, 1992.
13. Alternative Development Patterns: New Settlements. U.K. Department of the Environment. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1993.
14. Reducing Transport Emissions Through Planning. U.K. Department of the Environment. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1993.
15. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. The Effects of Land Use and Travel Demand Management Strategies on Commuting Behavior. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1994.
16. Urban Travel and Sustainable Development. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1997.
17. Schimek, P. Household Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: How Much Does Residential Density Matter? In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 120-125.
18. Gordon, P., and H. W. Richardson. Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 63, No. 1, 1997, pp. 95-106.
19. Ewing, R. Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 63, No. 1, 1997, pp. 107-126.
20. Rodier, C. J., and R. A. Johnston. Travel, Emissions, and Welfare Effects of Travel Demand Management Measures. In Transportation Research Record 1598, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 18-24.
21. DKS Associates. Model Development and User Reference Report. Sacramento Area Council of Governments, Sacramento, Calif., Oct. 1994.
22. Small, K. A., and H. S. Rosen. Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice. Econometrica, Vol. 49, 1981, pp. 105-130.
23. Delucchi, M. A. The Annualized Social Cost of Motor Vehicle Use in the U.S., 1990-1991: Summary. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, June 1997.