Usual operations with symbolic data under normal symbolic form

Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 241-257

  Csernel, Marc ^a,b   De Carvalho, F A T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

^b INRIA ROCQUENCOURT   (France)

^c DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA FUNDAMENTAL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA REDUCTION;

NORMAL SYMBOLIC FORM (NSF); SYMBOLIC DATA ANALYSIS;

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS;

EID: 0033206496     PISSN: 15241904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1526-4025(199910/12)15:4<241::AID-ASMB390>3.0.CO;2-Z     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Diday E. Des objets de l'analyse des données à ceux de l'analyse des connaissances. In Induction symbolique et numérique à partir de données, Kodratoff Y, Diday E, (eds). Cepadues edn: Toulouse, 1991; 9-75.
2. Brito P, Diday E. Piramidal representation of symbolic objects. In: Knowledge, Data and Computer Assisted Decisions, Schader M, Gaul W (eds). Springer: Berlin, 1990; 3-16.
3. Chouakria A, Verde R, Diday E, Cazes P. Généralization de I'analyse factorielle des correspondences multiples à des objects symboliques. In Proceedings of Quatriemes Rencontres de la Société Francophone de Classification. Vannes, 1996.
4. Ichino M, Yaguchi H. Generalized Minkowsky metrics for mixed features type data analysis. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics 1994; 24(4): 698-708.
5. Ichino M, Yaguchi H, Diday E. A fuzzy symbolic pattern classifier. In Ordinal and Symbolic Data Analysis, Diday E. et al. (eds). Springer: Heidelberg, 1996; 92-102.
6. Nagabhusan P, Gowda KC, Diday E. Dimensional reduction of symbolic data. Pattern Recognition Letters 1995; 16: 219-223.
7. Diday E. The symbolic approach in clustering and related methods of data analysis: the basic choices. In Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis, Bock HH (eds). Elsevier Science Publishers B.V: Amsterdam, 1991; 673-684.
8. Ichino M. General metrics for mixed features - the cartesian space theory for pattern recognition. In International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1988.
9. De Carvalho FAT. Clustering of constrained symbolic objects based on dissimilarity functions. In Indo-French Seminar on Symbolic Data Analysis and its Applications, Diday E, Gowda KC (org). 23-25 September, Paris, 1997.
10. Codd EF. Further normalisation of the data base relational model. In Data Base System, Courant Computer Science Symposium Series, vol. 6. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliff, NJ. 1972.
11. Csernel M, De Carvalho FAT. Towards a normal symbolic form. In Data Science, Classification and Related Methods, Hayashi C et al. (eds). Springer: Tokyo, 1998; 379-386.
12. Csernel M. On the complexity of computation with symbolic objects using domain knowledge. In Advances in Data Science and Classification, Rizzi A, Vicchi M, Bock HH (eds). Springer: Berlin, 1998; 403-408.
13. De Carvalho FAT. Extension based proximities between constrained boolean symbolic objects. In Data Science, Classification and Related Methods, Hayashi C. et al. (eds). Springer: Tokyo, 1998; 370-378.
14. De Carvalho FAT, Souza RMC. Statistical proximity functions of Boolean symbolic objects based on histograms. In New Advances in Data Science and Classification, Rizzi A et al. (eds). Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; 391-396.
15. Gowda KC, Diday E. Symbolic clustering using a new dissimilarity measure. Pattern Recognition 1991; 24(6): 567-578.
16. Gowda KC, Ravi TV. Agglomerative clustering of symbolic objects using the concepts of both similarity and dissimilarity. Pattern Recognition Letters 1995; 16: 647-652.
17. Palumbo F, Verde R. Non-symetrical factorial discriminant analysis for symbolic objects. In Proceedings of the International Conference on ASMDA 97 - Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, Rocco Curto, Napoles, Italia, 1997; 283-290.