Role of the research ethics committee

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 564-569

  Gelling, Leslie ^a  

^a ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD; WORK;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ETHICS COMMITTEES; HUMANS; JOB DESCRIPTION; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; PATIENT ADVOCACY; RESEARCH; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0033205746     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0349     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ahmed AH, Nicholson KG 1996 Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees. Journal of Medical Ethics 22(5): 263-266
2. Alderson P 1995 Consent to research: the role of the nurse. Nursing Standard 9(36): 28-31
3. Aldridge HD, Walport MJ 1995 Ethical issues in clinical research: the role of the ethics committee. British Journal of Urology 76(Supp 2): 23-28
4. Booth CC 1993 Clinical research. In: Bynum WF, Porter E (Eds). Companion encyclopaedia of history of medicine. Routledge, London.
5. Cookson JB 1992 Auditing a research ethics committee. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 26(2): 181-183
6. Foster C 1995 Why do research ethics committees disagree with each other. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 29(3): 315-318
7. Gilbert C, Fulford K, Parker C 1989 Diversity of the practice of district ethics committee. British Medical Journal 299(6713): 1437-1439.
8. Harries H, Fentem P, Tuxworth W, Hoinville G 1994 Local research ethics committees. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 28(2): 150-154
9. Kent G 1997 The views of members of local research ethics committees, researchers and members of the public towards the role and functions of LRECs. Journal of Medical Ethics 23(3): 186-190
10. Parahoo K 1997 Nursing research: principles, process and issues. MacMillan, London
11. Redshaw ME, Harris A, Baum JD 1996 Research ethics committee audit: differences between committees. Journal of Medical Ethics 22(2) 78-82
12. Royal College of Physicians of London 1984 Guidelines on the practice of ethics committees in medical research. Royal College of Physicians, London
13. Royal College of Physicians of London 1990 Guidelines on the practice of ethics committees in medical research involving human subjects. Royal College of Physicians, London
14. Royal College of Physicians of London 1996 Guidelines on the practice of ethics committees in medical research involving human subjects. Royal College of Physicians, London
15. Seidelman WE 1996 Nuremberg lamentation for the forgotten victims of medical science. British Medical Journal 313(7070): 1463-1467
16. Tonge J, Barton T 1998 Towards a European Directive. Clinical Research Focus 9(4): 8-12
17. While AE 1996 Research ethics committees at work: the experience of one multi-location study. Journal of Medical Ethics 22(6): 352-355