Optimization and interaction of media components in ethanol production using Zymomonas mobilis by response surface methodology

Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 334-338

  Sreekumar, Othumpangat ^b   Chand, Nagin ^a   Basappa, Sidappa C ^a  

^a CENTRAL FOOD TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b SHINSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ethanol production; Optimization; Response surface methodology; Zymomonas mobilis

Indexed keywords

AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; BACTERIA; COMPOSITION EFFECTS; EXTRACTION; GLUCOSE; MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS; PHOSPHATES; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; YEAST;

AMMONIUM SULFATE; MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD (RSM);

ETHANOL;

ALCOHOL; AMMONIUM SULFATE; GLUCOSE; MAGNESIUM SULFATE; PHOSPHATE; POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FERMENTATION; NONHUMAN; PH; TEMPERATURE; ZYMOMONAS MOBILIS;

ZYMOMONAS MOBILIS;

EID: 0033199302     PISSN: 13891723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-1723(00)80021-3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. 1. Rogers, P. L., Lee, K. J., Skotnicki, M. L., and Tribe, D. E.: Ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis. Adv. Biochem. Eng., 23, 37-84 (1982).
2. 2. Baratti, J., Verma, R., and Bulock, J. D.: High productivity ethanol fermentation on a mineral medium using flocculent strain of Zymomonas mobilis. Biotechnol. Lett., 8, 175-180 (1986).
3. 3. Swings, J. and DeLey, J.: Biology of Zymomonas. J. Bacteriol. Rev., 41, 1-46 (1977).
4. 4. Viikare, L.: Carbohydrate metabolism in Zymomonas. CRC Rev. Biotechnol., 7, 237-261 (1988).
5. 5. Lawford, H. G., Rousseau, J. D., and McMillan, J. D.: Optimization of seed production for a simultaneous saccharification cofermentation biomass-to-ethanol process using recombinant Zymomonas. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 63, 269-286 (1997).
6. 6. Cocharan, W. G. and Cox, G. M.: Experimental designs, p. 335-375. John Wiley and Sons, NY (1957).
7. 7. Maddox, I. S. and Richard, S. H.: Use of response surface methodology for rapid optimization of microbiological media. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 43, 197-204 (1977).
8. 8. Prapulla, S. G., Jacob, Z., Nagin, C., Rajalakshmi, R., and Karanth, N. G.: Maximization of lipid production by Rhodotorula gracilis CFR-1 using response surface methodology. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 40, 965-970 (1992).
9. 9. Oh, S., Rheem, S., Sim, J., Kim, S., and Baek, Y.: Optimizing conditions for the growth of Lactobacillus casei YIT 9018 in tryptone-yeast extract-glucose medium by using response surface methodology. Appl. Environ Microbiol., 61, 3809-3814 (1995).
10. 10. Sreekumar, O. and Basappa, S. C.: Characterization of a superior thermotolerant mutant of Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 for ethanol production. Biotechnol. Lett., 13, 365-370 (1991).
11. 11. Sreekumar, O. and Basappa, S. C.: Effect of calcium and sodium salts on ethanol production in high sugar fermentation by free cells of Zymomonas mobilis. Biotechnol. Lett., 14, 511-514 (1992).
12. 12. Nedler, J. A. and Mead, R.: A simple method for function minimization. Computer J., 7, 305-313 (1965).
13. 13. Miller, G. L.: Use of dinitrosalycylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem., 31, 426-428 (1959).
14. 14. Anthony, J. C.: Gas chromatographic determination of ethanol in beer. J. Assoc. Offi. Anal. Chem., 64, 192-193 (1984).
15. 15. Goodman, A. E., Rogers, P. L., and Skotnicki, M. L.: Minimal medium for isolation of auxotrophic Zymomonas mutants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 44, 496-498 (1982).