Internal dose, uncertainty analysis, and complexity of risk models

Environment International

Volumn 25, Issue 6-7, 1999, Pages 841-852

  Cox Jr , Louis Anthony ^a  

^a Cox Associates ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURVE FITTING; GRAPH THEORY; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NATURAL SCIENCES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RANDOM PROCESSES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BAYESIAN DECISION ANALYTIC APPROACH; RISK MODEL; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

HEALTH RISK; MODELING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CONFERENCE PAPER; CURVE FITTING; DECISION MAKING; ENTROPY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033199079     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0160-4120(99)00062-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bhaskar, R.; Nigam, A. Qualitative physics using dimensional analysis. Artif. Intelligence 45: 73-112; 1990.
2. Buckley, J.J. Entropy principles in decision-making under risk. Risk Anal. 5: 303-313; 1985.
3. Chatfield, C. Statistics for Technology. 3rd Ed. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall; 1983.
4. Cover, T.M.; Thomas, J.A. Elements of Information Theory. New York, NY: Wiley; 1991.
5. Doucet, P.; Sloep, P.B. Mathematical Modeling in the Life Sciences. New York, NY: Ellis-Horwood; 1992.
6. Dubois, D.; Wellman, M.P.; D'Ambrosio, B.; Smets, P., eds. Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Proc. Eighth Conference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1992.
7. Epstein, L.G.; Le Breton, M. Dynamically consistent beliefs must be Bayesian. J. Econ. Theory 61: 11-22; 1993.
8. Goodman, J. A comment on the maximum entropy principle. Risk Anal. 7(2): 269-272; 1987.
9. Laffont, J.J. The Economics of Uncertainty and Information. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press; 1990.
10. Lauritzen, S.L.; Spiegelhalter, D.J. Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., Series B 50(2): 157-224; 1988.
11. Lin, C.C.; Segel, L.A. Mathematics Applied to Deterministic Problems in the Natural Sciences. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 1988.
12. Pearl, J. Probabilistic Inference in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1988.
13. Quiggin, J. Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-dependent Model. Boston, MA: Kluwer; 1993.
14. Schachter, R. An ordered examination of influence diagrams. Networks 20: 535-563; 1990.
15. Shenoy, P.P. Valuation-based systems for bayesian decision analysis. Oper. Res. 40(3): 463-483; 1992.