Systems of biomedical information on the Internet: Bibliographic contents and electronic magazines;Sistemas de informacion biomedica en Internet: Indices bibliograficos y revistas electronicas

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 471-478

  Belmonte, M ^a  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL DE CASTELLÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliographic indices; Current Contents; Database; EMBASE; Internet; MEDLINE

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA BASE; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PUBLICATION; ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; HUMAN;

DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; INTERNET; PERIODICALS;

EID: 0033197590     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.2905.99324     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. OMNI Consortium, MEDLINE on the Internet. In http://www.omni.ac.uk/ general-info/Internet_medline.html [visitado el 29 septiembre 1998].
2. Clarke M. MeSH terms must be used in MEDLINE searches. Br Med J 1997; 314: 1203. In http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/ 7088/1203/a [visitado 13 octubre 1998].
3. Ojala M. The pitfalls of simpler searching... and the potential for professional expertise. Information World Review 1995; 105: 8.
4. Gretz M, Schmitt RD, Tomas M. EMBASE remains EMBASE-on every host? A comparative analysis of EMBASE on the hosts DATASTAR, DIALOG, DIMDI and STN. Comput Biomed Res 1996; 29: 494-506.
5. Crowlesmith I. Host differences when searching EMBASE. On line 1995; 88-92.
6. Welsh S. Evaluating MEDLINE: PubMed. In http://www.omni.ac.uk/ general-info/Internet_medline/pubmed.html [visita 29 sept 1998].
7. Barclay AR. NAHRS Task Force to Evaluate Internet and CD-ROM Search Engines for MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Rndex: a Librarian's Perspective. (In press).
8. Kiley R. Evaluating MEDLINE: HealthGate. In http://www.omni.ac.uk/ general-info/Internet_medline/healthgate.html [visitado el 29 septiembre 1998].
9. Basch R. Measuring the quality of data: report of the Fourth Annual SCOUG Retreat. Database Searcher 1990; 6: 18-23.
10. Tenopir C, Hover K. When is the same database not the same? Database differences among systems. On line 1993; 20-7.
11. Anagnostelis B. Evaluation of Internet MEDLINE for OMNI. In http://www.omni.ac.uk/general-info/intmedeval.html [visitado el 29 septiembre 1998].
12. Detmer WM. MEDLINE on the Web: ten questions to ask when evaluating a Web based service. In http://www.med.virginia.edu/∼wmd4n/ medline.html [visitado el 29 septiembre 1998].
13. Anagnostelis B, Cooke A. Evaluation criteria for different versions of the same database-a comparison of MEDLINE services available via the World Wide Web. In http://omni.ac.uk/agec/iolim97/ [visita 29 septiembre 1998].
14. McConnell J, Horton R. Having electronic preprints is logical. Br Med J 1998; 316: 1907. In http://www.bmj.com/ cgi/content/full/316/ 7148/1907 [visitado el 13 octubre 1998].
15. Delamothe T. Electronic preprints: what should the BMJ do? Br Med J 1998; 316: 794-5. In http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/316/ 7134/794 [visitado el 13 octubre 1998].
16. Taubes G. Electronic preprints point the way to 'author empowerment'. Science 1996; 271: 767-8.
17. Digital Journal of Ophthalmology. In http://www.djo.harvard.edu/[visitado el 13 octubre 1998].
18. LaPorte RE, Merler E, Akazawa S. The death of biomedical journals. Br Med J 1995; 310: 1387-90. In http://194.216.217.166// archive/ 6991ed2.htm y en castellano en http://www.pitt.edu/HOME/ GHNet/ publications/assassin/spanish.html [visitado 13 octubre 1998].
19. Gellert GA. The death of biomedical journals. Electronic journals supplement their paper cousins. Br Med J 1995; 311: 507.
20. Quinn SE, et al. Biomedical journals not dead yet. Electronic publications are hard to access. Br Med J 1995; 311: 879.
21. LaPorte RE. Internet server with targeted access would cure information deficiency in developing countries. Br Med J 1997; 314: 980-1. In www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7085/980/a.