Step activity monitor: Increased accuracy in quantifying ambulatory activity

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 703-708

  Shepherd, E F ^a   Toloza, E ^a   McClung, C D ^a   Schmalzried, T P ^a  

^a Joint Replacement Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETERS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL EQUIPMENT; JOINT PROSTHESES;

DIGITAL PEDOMETERS; STEP ACTIVITY MONITOR;

BIOMECHANICS;

ACCELEROMETER; ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOBILIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0033197567     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100170512     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 1 Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C: Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66: 228–241, 1984
2. 2 Bassey EJ, Dallosso HM, Fentem PH, Irving JM, Patrick JM: Validation of a simple mechanical accelerometer (pedometer) for the estimation of walking activity. Eur J Appl Physiol 56: 323–330, 1987
3. 3 Belcher GL, Radomisli TE, Abate JA, Stabile LA, Trafton PG: Functional outcome analysis of operatively treated malleolar fractures. J Orthop Trauma 11: 106–109, 1997
4. 4 Bouten CV, Westerterp KR, Verduin M, Janssen JD: Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26: 1516–1523, 1994
5. 5 Cates HE, Faris PM, Keating EM, Ritter MA: Polyethylene wear in cemented metal‐backed acetabular cups. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75: 249–253, 1993
6. 6 Charnley J: The long‐term results of low‐friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 54: 61–76, 1972
7. 7 Charnley J, Cupic Z: The nine and ten year results of the low‐friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 95: 9–25, 1973
8. 8 Charnley J, Halley DK: Rate of wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 112: 170–179, 1975
9. 9 Clarke IC: Wear of artificial joint materials. I. Friction and wear studies: validity of wear‐screening protocols. Eng Med 10: 115–122, 1981
10. 10 Clarke IC, Kabo JM: Wear in total hip replacement. In: Hip Arthroplasty, pp 535–549. Ed by HC Amstutz. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1991
11. 11 Griffith MJ, Seidenstein MK, Williams D, Charnley J: Socket wear in Charnley low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 137: 37–47, 1978
12. 12 Hernandez JR, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB, Ritter MA: Polyethylene wear in uncemented acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76: 263–266, 1994
13. 13 James WP: The epidemiology of obesity. Ciba Found Symp 201: 1–11, 1996
14. 14 Janz KF: Validation of the CSA accelerometer for assessing children's physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26: 369–375, 1994
15. 15 Kabo JM, Gebhard JS, Loren G, Amstutz HC: In vivo wear of polyethylene acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75: 254–258, 1993
16. 16 Kashiwazaki H, Inaoka T, Suzuki T, Kondo Y: Correlations of pedometer readings with energy expenditure in workers during free‐living daily activities. Eur J Appl Physiol 54: 585–590, 1986
17. 17 Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B: Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72: 518–528, 1990
18. 18 Meijer GA, Westerterp KR, Verhoeven FM, Koper HB, Ten Hoor F: Methods to assess physical activity with special reference to motion sensors and accelerometers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 38: 221–229, 1991
19. 19 Melanson EL Jr, Freedson PS: Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) actvity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27: 934–940, 1995
20. 20 Melanson EL Jr, Freedson PS: Physical activity assessment: a review of methods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 36: 385–396, 1996
21. 21 Nichols JF, Patterson P, Early T: A validation of a physical activity monitor for young and older adults. Can J Sport Sci 17: 299–303, 1992
22. 22 Saris WH, Binkhorst RA: The use of pedometer and actometer in studying daily physical activity in man. Part I. Reliability of pedometer and actometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 37: 219–228, 1977
23. 23 Saris WH, Binkhorst RA: The use of pedometer and actometer in studying daily physical activity in man. Part II. Validity of pedometer and actometer measuring the daily physical activity. Eur J Appl Physiol 37: 229–235, 1977
24. 24 Schmalzried TP, Kwong LM, Jasty M, Sedlacek RC, Haire TC, O'Connor DO, Bragdon CR, Kabo JM, Malcolm AJ, Harris WH: The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop 274: 60–78, 1992
25. 25 Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Northfield MR, Akizuki KH, Frankel RE, Belcher G, Amstutz HC: Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 80: 54–59, 1998
26. 26 Seedhom BB, Wallbridge NC: Walking activities and wear of prostheses. Ann Rheum Dis 44: 838–843, 1985
27. 27 Sequeira MM, Rickenbach, M, Wietlisbach V, Tullen B, Schutz Y: Physical activity assessment using a pedometer and its comparison with a questionnaire in a large population survey. Am J Epidemiol 142: 989–999, 1995
28. 28 Sichieri R, Everhart JE, Hubbard VS: Relative weight classifications in the assessment of underweight and overweight in the United States. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 16: 303–312, 1992
29. 29 Wallbridge N, Dowson D: The walking activity of patients with artificial hip joints. Eng Med 11: 95–96, 1982
30. 30 Washburn R, Chin MK, Montoye HJ: Accuracy of pedomèter in walking and running. Res Q Exerc Sport 51: 695–702, 1980
31. 31 Woolson ST, Murphy MG: Wear of the polyethylene of Harris‐Galante acetabular components inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77: 1311–1314, 1995
32. 32 Wroblewski BM: Direction and rate of socket wear in Charnley low‐friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 67: 757–761, 1985
33. 33 Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC: Assessing activity of total joint replacement patients: comparison of four methods. Trans Orthop Res Soc 23: 276, 1998