The road to hell: Intentions and propositional attitude ascription

Mind and Language

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 356-375

  Saul, Jennifer M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033196517     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00116     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Braun, D. 1998: Understanding Belief Reports. Philosophical Review.
2. Crimmins, M. 1992: Talk About Beliefs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Crimmins, M. and Perry, J. 1989: The Prince and the Phone Booth. Journal of Philosophy, 86, 685-711.
4. Forbes, G. 1990: The Indispensability of Sinn. Philosophical Review, 99, 535-63.
5. Forbes, G. 1993: Reply to Marks. Philosophical Studies, 69, 281-95.
6. Kripke, S. 1988: A Puzzle About Belief. In N. Salmon and S. Soames (eds), Propositions and Attitudes. Oxford University Press, 102-48.
7. Richard, M. 1990: Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them. Cambridge University Press.
8. Saul, J. 1998: The Pragmatics of Attitude Ascription. Philosophical Studies, 92, 363-89.
9. Saul, J. 1999: The Best of Intentions: Ignorance, Idiosyncrasy, and Belief Reporting. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 29, 29-48.
10. Schiffer, S. 1992: Belief Ascription. Journal of Philosophy, 89, 499-521.
11. Soames, S. 1988: Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content. In N. Salmon and S. Soames (eds), Propositions and Attitudes. Oxford University Press, 197-239.