Scholarship as process

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 267-277

  Mitchell, Murray ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033196282     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002248719905000404     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Allison, P. D., & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39, 596-606.
2. Astin, A. W., & Chang, M. J. (1995). Colleges that emphasize research and teaching: Can you have your cake and eat it too? Change, 27(5), 44-49.
3. Baldwin, R. G., & Austin, A. E. (1995). Toward greater understanding of faculty research collaboration. The Review of Higher Education, 19(2), 45-70.
4. Behymer, C. (1974). Institutional and personal correlates of faculty productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
5. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
6. Bey, T. M., & Holmes, C. T. (Eds.) (1992). Mentoring: Contemporary principles and issues. Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.
7. Blackburn, R., Behymer, C., & Hall, D. (1978). Research notes: Correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education, 51, 132-141.
8. Blackburn, R. T., & Havinghurst, R. J. (1979). Career patterns of U.S. male academic social scientists. Higher Education, 8(5), 553-572.
9. Bok, D. (1986). Higher learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
11. Braxton, J. M. (1983). Department colleagues and individual faculty publication productivity. The Review of Higher Education, 6(2), 115-128.
12. Burch, B. G. (1989). Perceptions of the role and scholarly reputation of the education professoriate. In R. Wisniewski & E. Ducharme (Eds.), The professors of teaching (pp. 87-104). Albany: State University of New York Press.
13. Caplow, T., & McGee, R. J. (1958). The academic marketplace. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
14. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1985) The faculty: Deeply troubled. Change, 17, 31-34.
15. Clemente, F. (1973). Early career determinants of research productivity. American Journal of Sociology, 79(2), 400-419.
16. Clifford, G. J., & Guthrie, J. W. (1988). Ed school: A brief for professional education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
17. Crane, D. (1965). Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review, 30, 699-714.
18. Crase, D. (1993). Highly productive scholars: What drives them toward success? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 64 (6), 80-82.
19. Creswell, J. W. (1985). Faculty research performance: Lessons from the sciences and the social sciences. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Rep. No. 4). Washington, DC: Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
20. Creswell, J. W., Barnes, M. W., & Wendel, F. (1982, March). Correlates of faculty research productivity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
21. Cutten, G. B. (1958). The college professor as teacher. School and Society, 86, 372-375.
22. Daly, W. T. (1994). Teaching and scholarship: Adapting American higher education to hard times. Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 45-57.
23. Ducharme, E. R. (1993). The lives of teacher educators. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Ducharme, E. R., & Agne, R. M. (1982). The education professoriate: A research-based perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 300-336.
25. Feldman, K. A. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26, 227-298.
26. Finkelstein, M. J. (1984). The American academic profession. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
27. Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 13(2), 285-305.
28. Freeman, B. C. (1977). Faculty women in the American university: Up the down staircase. In P. G. Altback (Ed.), Comparative perspectives on the academic profession (pp. 160-190). New York: Praeger.
29. Gibbs, G. (1995). Promoting excellent teaching is harder than you'd think: A note from an outside observer of the roles and rewards initiative. Change, 27(3), 16-20.
30. Hargens, L. L., & Hagstrom, W. O. (1967). Sponsored and contest mobility of American academic scientists. Sociology of Education, 40(1), 24-38.
31. Harry, J., & Goldner, N. S. (1972). The null relationship between teaching and research. Sociology of Education, 45(1), 47-60.
32. Hunter, D. E., & Kuh, G. D. (1984, April). A profile of prolific scholars in higher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
33. Jacobson, R. L. (1992). Colleges face new pressure to increase faculty productivity. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 38(32), A1, A16-A18.
34. Knorr, K. D., Mittermeir, R., Aicholzer, G., & Waller, G. (1979). Individual publication productivity as a social position effect in academic and industrial research units. In F. M. Andrews (Ed.), Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries (pp. 55-94). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. Ladd, E. C., & Lipset, S. M. (1976). Nearly all professors are satisfied with their choice of an academic career. Chronicle of Higher Education, 12(10), 11.
36. Lawson, H. A. (1990). Sport pedagogy research: From information-gathering to useful knowledge. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10, 1-20.
37. Leary, L. (1959). The scholar as teacher. School and Society, 87, 362-363.
38. Locke, L. F. (1995). An analysis of prospects for changing faculty roles and rewards: Can scholarship be reconsidered? Quest, 47, 506-524.
39. Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review, 43, 889-908.
40. Long, J. S., & McGinnis, R. (1981). Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 46, 422-442.
41. Magner, D. K. (1994). Association of university professors challenges the belief that professors are underworked. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 40(21), A18.
42. McKeachie, W. J. (1983). Faculty as a renewable resource. In R. G. Baldwin & R. T. Blackburn (Eds.), College faculty: Versatile human resources in a period of constraint. New Directions for Institutional Research No. 40 (pp. 57-66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Metzler, M. W. (1994). Scholarship reconsidered for the professoriate of 2010. Quest, 46, 440-455.
44. Metzler, M. W., & Freedman, M. S. (1985). Here's looking at you PETE: A profile of physical education teacher education faculty. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 123-133.
45. Mitchell, M. F. (1992a). A descriptive analysis and academic genealogy of major contributors to JTPE in the 1980s. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 303-314.
46. Mitchell, M. F. (1992b). Scholarly behaviors of physical education methods teacher educators in Ohio. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 426-422.
47. Mitchell, M. F. (1993). Linking teacher educators, knowledge, and the quality of practice in schools. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12, 399-412.
48. Mitchell, M. F. (1997). Productive pedagogy scholars: Why they do it and how. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 278-299.
49. Mitchell, M. F., & Lawson, H. A. (1986). Career paths and role orientations of professors of teacher education in physical education. In M. Pieron & G. Graham (Eds.), Sport pedagogy: The 1984 Olympic Scientific Congress proceedings (Vol. 6, pp. 41-46). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
50. Mitra, S. K. (1974). A brief note on American education research. American Educational Research Journal, 11, 41-47.
51. Noser, T. C., Manakyan, H., & Tanner, J. R. (1996). Research productivity and perceived teaching effectiveness: A survey of economics faculty. Research in Higher Education, 37, 299-321.
52. Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1966). Scientists in organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
53. Reskin, B. F. (1979). Academic sponsorship and scientists' careers. Sociology of Education, 52, 129-146.
54. Rink, J. E. (1989, October). Two decades of research on teaching: Where are we now? Paper presented at the R. Tait McKenzie Symposium on Sport Pedagogy, Knoxville, TN.
55. Roe, A. (1972). Patterns in productivity of scientists. Science, 176, 940-941.
56. Schneider, B. L., & Raths, J. (1983). Teacher educators: Do they have a place in research-oriented universities? The High School Journal, 66(2), 70-82.
57. Schwebel, M. (1989). The new priorities and the education faculty. In R. Wisniewski & E. R. Ducharme (Eds.), The professors of teaching: An inquiry (pp. 52-66). Albany: State University of New York Press.
58. Sykes, C. J. (1988). ProfScam: Professors and the demise of higher education. New York: St. Martin's Press.
59. Wisniewski, R., & Ducharme, E. R. (1989). Where we stand. In R. Wisniewski & E. R. Ducharme (Eds.), The professors of teaching: An inquiry (pp. 147-162). Albany: State University of New York Press.