Explaining the decisions to carry out product and process innovations: The Spanish case

Journal of High Technology Management Research

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 223-242

  Martinez Ros, Ester ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033196272     PISSN: 10478310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-8310(99)00016-4     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 567-574.
2. Amabile, T. M. (1983), The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer-Verlag, New York.
3. Arundel A, & Kabla, I. (1998). What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy, 27, 127-141.
4. Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Universities-National Bureau Commitee for Economic Research, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5. Blundell, R. W., Bond, S., Deveraux, M., & Schantarelly, F. (1992). Investment and Tobin's Q. Journal of Econometrics, 51, 233-257.
6. Blundell, R. W., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1993). Knowledge Stocks, Persistent Innovation and Market Dominance: Evidence from a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms. IFS WP 93/19.
7. Blundell, R. W., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1995). Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. The Economic Journal, 105, 333-344.
8. Bound, J., Cummins, C., Griliches, Z., Hall, B. H., & Jafee, A. (1984). Who does R&D and who patents? In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago, University of Chicago for the NBER.
9. Bozeman, B., & Link, A. N. (1983). Investments in Technology: Corporate Strategies and Public Policy Alternatives. New York: Praeger.
10. Brouwer, E., & Kleinknecht, A. (1998). Innovative output and a firm's propensity to patent. An exploration of CIS micro data. Delft Economic Papers 1998-4.
11. Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organisation, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
12. Crepon B., & Duguet, E. (1997). Research and development, competition and innovation Pseudo-maximum likelihood and simulated maximum likelihood methods applied to count data models with heterogeneity. Journal of Econometrics 79, 355-378.
13. Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy Management Journal, 21, 193-210.
14. Deward, R. D., &. Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422-1433.
15. Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O'Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682-695.
16. García-Montalvo, J. (1993). Patents and R&D at the firm level: A new look. Revista Española de Economía, Monográfico: Investigación y Desarrollo, pp. 67-82.
17. Griliches, Z., & Mairesse, J. (1984). Productivity and R&D at the firm level. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity: 339-74. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
18. Hall, B. H. (1990). The impact of corporate restructuring on industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 85-124.
19. Hall, B. H., & Mairesse, J. (1993). Exploring the Productivity of Research and Development in French Manufacturing Firms. National Bureau of Economic Research and Centre de Reserche en Economie et Statistique. Working Paper 9326.
20. Hall, B., Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. (1986). Patents and R&D: Is there a lag? International Economic Review, 27.
21. Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1970). Market structure, elasticity of demand, and incentive to invent. Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 241-252.
22. Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge University Press.
23. Kraft, K. (1990). Are product-and process-innovations independent of each other? Applied Economics, 22, 1029-1038.
24. Leonard,-Barton, D., & Deschamps, Y. (1988). Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Management Science, 34(10), 1252-1265.
25. Levin, R. C., Cohen, W. M., & Mowery, D. C. (1985). R&D appropiability, opportunity and market structure: New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 75, 20-24.
26. Levin, R. C., & Reiss, P. C. (1984). Test of a Schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure. In Z. Griliches (Ed.) R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Link, A. N. (1982). An analysis of the composition of R&D spending. Southern Economic Journal, 49, 342-349.
28. Link, A. N., & Lunn, J. (1984). Rates of return to R&D and market structure. Review of Industrial Organization, 1, Autumn, 232-239.
29. Lunn, J. (1986). An empirical analysis of process and product patenting: A simultaneous equation framework. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 34, 319-330.
30. Malerba, F. (1985). The Semiconductor Business: The Economics of Rapid Growth and Decline. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
31. Martínez-Ros, E. (1998). Innovation and Rents: Three Empirical Essays Using Data from Spanish Manufacturing Firms. Doctoral Thesis. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. Barcelona.
32. Moch, M. K., & Morse, E. V. (1977). Size , centralization and organizational adoption of innovations. American Sociological Review, 42, 716-725.
33. Pavitt, K., Robson, M., & Townsend, J. (1987). The size distribution of innovating firms in the U.K.: 1945-1983. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 297-316.
34. Reinganum, J. (1989). The timing of innovation. In Schmalensee & Willig (Ed.) The Handbook of Industrial Organization Vol I.
35. Scherer, F. M. (1983). Concentration, R&D, and productivity change. Southern Economic Journal, 50, 221-225.
36. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
37. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, Harper. Scott, J.T. (1984). Firm vs. Industry variability in RD intensity. In Z. Griliches (Ed.) R&d, Patents and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.
38. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, Harper. Scott,J.T. (1984). Firm vs. Industry variability in RD intensity. In Z. Griliches (Ed.) R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.
39. Soete, L. L. G. (1979). Firm size and inventive activity: The evidence reconsidered. European Economic Review, 12, 319-340.
40. Spence, A. M. (1975). Monopoly, quality, and regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 6, 417-29.
41. Symeonidis, G. (1996). Innovation, firm size and market structure: Schumpeterian hypothesis and some new themes. OCDE Economic Studies, 27, 35-70.
42. Zmud, R. W. (1984). An examination of "Push-Pull" theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Management Science, 30, 727-738.