Metaevaluation of "the effectiveness of comprehensive, case management interventions: Evidence from the national evaluation of the comprehensive child development program"

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 577-582

  Sanders, James R ^a  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033195636     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821409902000316     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. American Evaluation Association. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding Principles for Evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 34, 19-26. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Gray, S. T. (Ed.). (1998). Evaluation with power. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. St. Pierre, R. G., & Layzer, J. I. (1998). Improving the life chances of children in poverty: Assumptions and what we have learned. Social Policy Report: Society for Research in Child Development, 12, 1-27.
5. St. Pierre, R. G., Layzer, J. I, Goodson, B. D., & Bernstein, L. S. (1999). The effectiveness of comprehensive, case management interventions: Evidence from the national evaluation of the comprehensive child development program. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 15-34.