|
|
|
Volumn 50, Issue 3, 1999, Pages
|
|
Differences in the diagnostic criteria used by Japanese and Western pathologists to diagnose colorectal carcinoma.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADENOCARCINOMA;
ARTICLE;
COLORECTAL TUMOR;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY;
DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE;
FEMALE;
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY;
HUMAN;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
JAPAN;
MALE;
PATHOLOGY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARD;
ADENOCARCINOMA;
COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS;
DATA COLLECTION;
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES;
ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL;
FEMALE;
GUIDELINES;
HUMANS;
JAPAN;
MALE;
PATHOLOGY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
WESTERN WORLD;
|
|
EID: 0033194684
PISSN: 00165107
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (6)
|
|
References (0)
|
