Should AEA begin a process for restricting membership in the profession of evaluation?

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 521-531

  Smith, M F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033192107     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821409902000311     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluation. (1995). In W.R. Shadish, D.L. Newman, M.A. Scheirer, & C. Wye, (Eds.) Guiding principles for evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66, 19-26. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Boothe, B. (1984). Certification-beyond reason. Performance and Instruction Journal, 23, 19-20.
3. Bogue, E. G., & Saunders, R. (1992). The Evidence for Quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Dawes, R. (1994). House of cards. New York: The Free Press.
5. Fortune, J. (1985). Understanding testing in occupational licensing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Freidson, E. (1983). The reorganization of the profession by regulation. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 279-289.
7. Hogan, D. B. (1983). The effectiveness of licensing. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 117-138.
8. Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). The ERS standards for program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 8, 151-253.
9. Mertens, D. M. (1994). Training evaluators: Unique skills and knowledge. In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), The preparation of professional evaluation: Issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 17-28. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Morell, J. A., & Flaherty, E. W. (1978). The development of evaluation as a profession: Current status and some predictions. Evaluation and Program Planning, 1, 11-17.
11. Morris, M., & Cohn, R. (1993). Program evaluators and ethical challenges: A national survey. Evaluation Review, 17, 621-642.
12. Newman, D. L. (1995). The future of ethics in evaluation: Developing the dialogue. In W. R. Shadish, D.L. Newman, M.A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66, 99-110. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Patton, M. Q. (1990). The challenge of being a profession. Evaluation Practice, 11, 45-51.
14. Raven, J. (1984). Some limitations of the standards. Evaluation and Program Planning, 7, 363-370.
15. Rossi, P. H. (1995). Doing good and getting it right. In W. R. Shadish, D.L. Newman, M.A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66, 55-59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Rossi, P. H. (1998). Personal communication.
17. Sanders, J. (1995). Correspondence on EvalTalk, a Listserve of the American Evaluation Association.
18. Scriven, M. (1996). Types of evaluation and types of evaluator. Evaluation Practice, 17, 151-161.
19. Scriven, M. (1998). Correspondence on EvalTalk, a Listserve of the American Evaluation Association.
20. Walsh, K. (1994). Quality, surveillance and performance measurement. In K. A. Riley & D. L. Nuttall (Eds.), Measuring quality: Education indicators - United Kingdom and international perspectives (Pp. 49-68). Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.
21. Worthen, B. R. (1994). Is evaluation a mature profession that warrants the preparation of evaluation professionals? In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), The preparation of professional evaluators: Issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 3-15. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.