Product architecture definition based upon customer demands

Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 329-335

  Yu, J S ^a   Gonzaiez Zugasti, J P ^a   Otto, K N ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; MARKETING; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

PRODUCT PORTFOLIO ARCHITECTURE;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 0033187748     PISSN: 10500472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.2829464     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bendat, J., and Piersol, A., Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986.
2. Churchill, G. A., Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, The Drydcn Press, Fort Worth, 1999.
3. Dahan, E., and Srinivasan, V., “The Predictive Power of Internet-Based Product Concept Testing Using Visual Depiction and Animation,” 1998.
4. Foster, R., Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage, Summit Books, New York, 1986.
5. Fujita, K., and Ishii, K., “Task Structuring Toward Computational Approaches to Product Variety Design,” Proceedings of the 1997 Design Automation Conference ASME #DETC97/DAC-3766, 1997.
6. Hayes, B., Measuring Customer Satisfaction: Development and Use of Questionnaires, ASQC Quality Press, 1992.
7. Henderson, R., and Clark, K., “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Fai Lure of Established Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 1990.
8. Krishnan, V., Singh, R., and Tirupati, D., “A Model-Based Approach for Planning and Developing A Family of Technology-Based Products,” The University of Texas at Austin Management Department Working Paper, April 1998, INFORMS Journal on Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, Forthcoming.
9. Martin, M., and Ishii, K., “Design for Variety: Development of Complexity Indices and Design Charts,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 1997.
10. Meyer, M., and Lehncrd, A., The Power of Product Platforms, The Free Press, New York.
11. Moore, W., Louvierc, J., and Verma, R., “Using Conjoint Analysis to Help Design Product Platforms,” Report No. 98-113, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, August 1998.
12. Sanderson, S., and Uzumeri, M., “Managing Product Families: The Case of the Sony Walkman,” Research Policy, 24, 1995.
13. Stone, R., Wood, K., and Crawford, R., “A Heuristic Method to Identify Modules from a Functional Description of a Product,” Proceedings of the 1998 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Atlanta, Georgia, September 13-16, 1998, DTM-5642.
14. Ulrich, K., “The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm,” Research Policy, 24, 1995.
15. Ulrich, K., and Eppinger, S., Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995.
16. Urban, G., and Hauser, J., Design and Marketing of New Products, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1993.