Microleakage evaluation of pit and fissure sealants done with different procedures, materials, and laser after invasive technique

Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 63-68

  Do Rego, Marcos Augusto ^a,b,c,e   De Araujo, Maria Amelia Maximo ^d  

^a MASTERS AND DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN PHYSICAL THERAPY   (Brazil)

^b UMC   (Brazil)

^c INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO   (Brazil)

^d SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^e NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FISSURE SEALANT; FLUORIDE; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LASER; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CHILD; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL FISSURES; DENTAL LEAKAGE; FLUORIDES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LASERS; PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0033182414     PISSN: 10534628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Boksman L, Carson B. Two-year retention and caries rates of UltraSeal XT and FluroShield light-cured pit and fissure sealants. Gen. Dent 46: 184-7, 1998.
2. Boksman, L. et al. A 2-year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent. Quintessence Int 24: 131-37, 1993.
3. Cernavin I. A comparison of the effects of Nd:YAG and Ho:YAG laser irradiation on dentine and enamel. Aust Dent J 40: 79-84, 1995.
4. Ciamponi AL, Feigal RJ, Santos JFF. In vitro evaluation of sealant microleakage under the influence of contamination, use of primer and type of sealant. Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo 12: 93-98, 1998.
5. Cozean C, et al. Dentistry for the 21st century? Erbium: YAG laser for teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 128: 1080-7, 1997.
6. Feldens, E.G. et al. Invasive technique of pit and fissure sealants in primary molars: A SEM study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 18: 187-90, 1994.
7. Forss H, Halme E. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 26: 21-5, 1998.
8. Fotos PG, Diaz-Arnold AM, Williams VD.The effect of microbial contamination and pH changes in storage solutions during in vitro assays of bonding agents. Dent Mater 6: 154-77 1990.
9. Fruits TJ, et al. Uses and properties of current glass ionomer cements: a review. Gen Dent 44: 410-8, 1996.
10. Garcia-Godoy F, Araujo FB. Enhancement of fissure sealant penetration and adaptation: the enameloplasty technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 19: 13-187, 1994.
11. Gonalves SEP. Dentin treatment - influence of acid-etching, laser irradiation and hypermineralization on shear bond strength of the adhesive system SMP Plus. Sao Jose dos Campos, 1997.208p. Tese (Doutorado em Odontologia) - Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho".
12. Hitt JC, Feigal RJ. Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 14: 41-6, 1992.
13. McLean JW, Wilson AD. Fissure sealing and filling with an adhesive glass-ionomer cement. Br Dent J 136; 269-76, 1974.
14. Miller M, Truhe T. Lasers in dentistry: an overview. JADA 124: 32-5, 1993.
15. Moore BK, Winkler MM, Ewoldsen N. Laboratory testing of light-cured glass ionomers as pit and fissure sealants. Gen Dent 43: 176-80, 1995.
16. Pick RM. Using lasers in clinical dental practice. JADA 124: 37-47, 1993.
17. Pitts NB. The diagnosis of dental caries: 1. Diagnostic methods for assessing buccal, lingual and occlusal surfaces. Dent Update 18: 393-6, 1991.
18. Rego MA, Araujo MAM. A 2-year clinical evaluation of fluoride-containing pit and fissure sealants placed with an invasive technique. Quintessence Int 27: 99-103, 1996.
19. Rego MA, Silva RCSP, Araujo MAM. Clinical evaluation of pit and fissure sealants with and without fluoride for two years. Rev Bras Odontol 55: 145-50, 1998.
20. Reid JS, Saunders WP, Chen YY.The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealant on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 22: 295-8, 1991.
21. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years. JADA 122: 34-42, 1991.
22. Simonsen RJ, Stallard RE. Sealant-restorations utilizing a diluted filled composite resin: one year results. Quintessence Int 8: 77-84, 1977.
23. Straffon LH, Dennison JB. Clinical evaluation comparing sealant and amalgam after 7 years: final report. JADA 117: 751-5, 1988.
24. Symons AL, Chu CY, Meyers IA. The effect of fissure morphology and pretreatment of the enamel surface on penetration and adhesion of fissure sealants. J Oral Rehabil 23: 791-8, 1996.
25. Theodoridou-Pahini S, Tolidis K, Papadogiannis Y. Degree of microleakage of some pit and fissure sealants: an in vitro study. Int J. Paediatr Dent 6: 173-6, 1996.
26. Walsh LJ, Perham S. Enamel fusion using a carbon dioxide laser: a technique for sealing pit and fissures. Clin Prev Dent 13: 13-6, 1991.
27. Xalabarde A. et al. Microleakage of fissure sealants after occlusal enameloplasty and termocycling. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22: 321-5, 1998.