Comparison of two implantation sites for testing intraosseous biocompatibility

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 615-618

  Tassery, Hervé ^a,c   Pertot, Wilhelm Joseph ^a   Camps, Jean ^a   Proust, Jean Pierre ^a   Déjou, Jacques ^b  

^a Department of Restorative Dentistry ^*

^b Medical School of Marseilles   (France)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; SUPER EBA; VITREMER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMUR; IMPLANT; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; RABBIT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMUR; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; RABBITS; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS;

EID: 0033182403     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80321-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gartner AH, Dorn SO. Advances in endodontic surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:357-8.
2. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Pitt Ford T, Kariyawasam SP. Tissue reaction to implanted Super-EBA and mineral trioxide aggregate in the mandible of guinea pigs: a preliminary report. J Endodon 1995;21:569-71.
3. Torabinejad M, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. The sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate as a root canal filling material. J Endodon 1993;19:591-5.
4. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford T. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endodon 1995;21:349-57.
5. Tassery H, Remusat M, Koubi G, Pertot WJ. A comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of Vitremer and the Super EBA by implantation into the mandible of rabbits. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1997;83:602-8.
6. International Standards Organization. ISO 10993-6(F)-07-15. Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 6. Tests for local effects after implantation: 1-8. CP 56. CH1211. Geneva: 1994.
7. Watson A, Paterson RC. Initial biological testing of root canal sealing materials. A critical review. J Dent 1992;20:259-65.
8. Kaminiski EJ, Oglesgy RJ, Wood NK, Sandrik J. The behavior of biological material at different sites of implantation. J Biomed Mater Res 1968; 2:81-8.
9. Déjou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the results of in vitro evaluation of microleakeage. Dent Mater 1996;12:342-9.
10. Craig KR, Harrison JW. Wound healing following demineralization of resected root ends in periradicular surgery. J Endodon 1993;19:339-47.
11. Pertot WJ, Stephan G, Tardieu C, Proust JP. Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of Dyract and Super EBA by implantation into the femur of rabbits. J Endodon 1997;23:315-9.
12. Pertot WJ, Camps J, Rémusat M, Proust JP. In vivo evaluation of the biocompatibility of two endodontic sealers implanted into the mandibular bone of rabbits. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:613-20.
13. Olsson B, Sliwkowsky A, Langeland K. Intraosseous implantation for biologic evaluation of endodontic materials. J Endodon 1981;7:253-65.
14. Olsen FK, Austin BP, Walia H. Osseous reaction to implanted ZOE retrograde filling materials in the tibia of rats. J Endodon 1994;20:389-94.
15. Pissiotis E, Sapounas G, Spangberg LS. Silver glass ionomer cement as a retrograde filling material: a study in vitro. J Endodon 1991;17:225-9.
16. Jesslen P, Zetterqvist L, Heimdahl A. Long-term results of amalgam versus glass-ionomer cement as apical sealant after apicectomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1995;79:101-31.
17. Barbara FM, Lewis PY, Thomas NS. Tissue response to implanted polymers: the significance of sample shape. J Biomed Mater Res 1976;10:391-7.
18. Snyder WR, Hoover J, Khoury R, Farach-Carson MC. Effect of agents used in perforation repair on osteoblastic cells. J Endodon 1997;23:158-61.
19. Abou-Hashied I, Camps J, Déjou J. Eugenol diffusion through dentin related to dentin hydraulic conductance. Dent Mater (in press).
20. Dorn SO, Gartner AH. Retrograde filling materials: a retrospective success-failure of amalgam, EBA and IRM. J Endodon 1992;18:391-8.