Incorporating maintainability in constructability review process

Journal of Management in Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 56-60

  Dunston, Phillip S ^a   Williamson, Craig E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; LIFE CYCLE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONNEL; RELIABILITY; REPAIR;

CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW PROCESS; LIFE CYCLE COST;

MAINTAINABILITY;

EID: 0033181551     PISSN: 0742597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1999)15:5(56)     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Assaf, A.-H., and Al-Shihah, M. (1995). "The effect of faulty construction on building maintenance." Building Research and Information, Vol. 23, 175-181.
2. Griffin, J. J. (1993). "Life cycle cost analysis: A decision aid." Life cycle costing for construction, J. W. Bull, ed., Blackie Academic and Professional, London.
3. Griffith, A., and Sidwell, S. A. (1995). Constructability in building and engineering projects, I. H. Seely, ed., Macmillan, London.
4. Houston Business Roundtable. (1993). "Model plan for constructability." Rep. from the Houston Business Roundtable, Houston.
5. McGeorge, J. F. (1988). "Design productivity: A quality problem." J. Mgmt. in Engrg., ASCE, 4(4), 350-362.
6. Philip, N. (1995). "Constructability of transportation projects," Masters thesis. University of Washington, Seattle.
7. Williamson, C. E. (1996). "Designing maintainability into the Constructability review process for the building envelope," Masters thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.