Test-retest reliability of selected ground reaction force parameters and their symmetry during running

Journal of Applied Biomechanics

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 330-336

  Bennell, Kim ^a   Crossley, Kay ^a   Wrigley, Tim ^a   Nitschke, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Force platform; Ground reaction force; Measurement; Reliability; Running

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; FORCE MEASUREMENT; LOADS (FORCES); MEASUREMENT ERRORS; RANDOM ERRORS; RELIABILITY; TESTING;

FORCE PLATFORM; GROUND REACTION FORCE; RUNNING;

BIOMECHANICS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RELIABILITY; RUNNING; SHOE; VELOCITY;

EID: 0033179508     PISSN: 10658483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jab.15.3.330     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bates, B.T. (1996). Single-subject methodology: an alternative approach. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 28, 631-638.
2. Bates, B.T., DeVita, P., & Kinoshita, H. (1983a). The effect of intra-individual variability on sample size. In B.M. Nigg & B. Kerr (Eds.), Biomechanical aspects of sports shoes and playing surfaces (pp. 191-198). Calgary: University printing.
3. Bates, B.T., Osternig, L.R., & Sawhill, J.A. (1983b). An assessment of subject variability, subject-shoe interaction, and the evaluation of running shoes using ground reaction force data. Journal of Biomechanics, 16, 181-191.
4. Cavanagh, P.R., & LaFortune, M.A. (1980). Ground reaction forces in distance running. Journal of Biomechanics, 13, 397-406.
5. DeVita, P., & Bates, B.T. (1987). The effect of time on selected ground reaction force parameters. In B. Jonsson (Ed.), Biomechanics X-B (pp. 1011-1014). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
6. DeVita, P., & Bates, B.T. (1988). Intraday reliability of ground reaction force data. Human Movement Science, 7, 73-85.
7. DeVita, P., Bates, B.T., & Lander, J.E. (1984). Reliability of ground reaction force data. Third Biannual Conference of the Canadian Society of Biomechanics: Human Locomotion III. Ottawa: Canadian Society for Biomechanics.
8. Hamill, J., Bates, B.T., & Knutzen, K.M. (1984). Ground reaction force symmetry during walking and running. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, 289-293.
9. Herzog, W., Nigg, B.M., Read, L.J., & Olsson, E. (1989). Asymmetries in ground reaction force patterns in normal human gait. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 21, 110-114.
10. Kinoshita, H., Bates, B.T., & DeVita, P. (1985). Intertrial variability for selected running gait parameters. In D. Winter, R. Norman, R. Wells, K. Hayes, & A. Patla (Eds.), Biomechanics IX-A (pp. 499-502). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
11. Lees, A. (1988). The role of athlete response tests in the biomechanical evaluation of running shoes. Ergonomics, 31, 1673-1681.
12. Lees, A., & Bouracier, J. (1994). The longitudinal variability of ground reaction forces in experienced and inexperienced runners. Ergonomics, 37, 197-206.
13. Lees, A. & Field, P. (1985). The consistency of ground reaction forces during running [abstract]. Journal of Sports Sciences, 3, 244.
14. Levy, M., Fewster, J.B., & Smith, G.A. (1997). Bilateral variability of ground reaction force characteristics during running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 29, S123.
15. Munro, C.F., Miller, D.I., & Fuglevand, A.J. (1987). Ground reaction forces in running: A reexamination. Journal of Biomechanics, 590, 147-155.
16. Nigg, B.M. (1986). Experimental techniques used in running shoe research. In B.M. Nigg (Ed.), Biomechanics of running shoes (pp. 27-53). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
17. Portney, L.G., & Watkins, M.P. (1993). Foundations of clinical research. Applications to practice. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
18. Robinson, R.O., Herzog, W., & Nigg, B.M. (1987). Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 10, 172-176.
19. Shrout, P.E., & Fleiss, J.L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.