Nurses' perceptions of the value of written reflection

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 452-463

  Jasper, Melanie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING STAFF; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; THINKING; WRITING;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING STAFF; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; STAFF DEVELOPMENT; THINKING; WRITING;

EID: 0033177263     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0328     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Agar M., MacDonald J. Focus groups and ethnography. Human Organisation. 54:1995;78-86.
2. Allen D.G., Bowers B., Diekelmann N. Writing to learn: a reconceptualization of thinking and writing in the nursing curriculum. Journal of Nursing Education. 28:1989;6-11.
3. Alsop A. The professional portfolio - purpose, process and practice. Part 1: portfolios and professional practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 58:1995;299-302.
4. American Philosophical Association 1990 Critical Thinking: a statement of expert concensus for purposes of educational assessment and instrument The Delphi Report: research findings and recommendations prepared for the committee on pre-college philosophy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED346-156
5. Callister LC 1993 The use of student journals in nurse education: making meaning out of clinical experience Journal of Nurse Education 32 (4): 185-186
6. Cayne J. V. Portfolios: a developmental influence? Journal of Advanced Nursing. 21:1995;395-405.
7. Gerrish K. An evaluation of a portfolio as an assessment tool for teaching practice placements. Nurse Education Today. 13:1993;172-179.
8. Glaser B, Strauss A 1967 The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, Aldine
9. Koch T. Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 19:1994;976-986.
10. Lincoln YS, Guba EG 1985 Naturalistic Enquiry. Beverley Hills, SAGE
11. Nyamathi A., Shuler P. Focus group interview: a research technique for informed nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 15:1990;1281-1288.
12. Paterson B. L. Developing and maintaining reflection in clinical journals. Nurse Education Today. 15:1995;211-220.
13. Reed J., Payton V. R. Focus groups: issues of analysis and interpretation. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 26:1997;765-771.
14. Rolfe G 1996 Closing the theory-practice gap - a new paradigm for nursing. Oxford, Butterworth Heinemann
15. Sandelowski M. The problem of rigour in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science. 8:1986;27-37.
16. Smith A., Russell J. Using critical learning incidents in nurse education. Nurse Education Today. 11:1991;284-291.
17. Strauss A, Corbin J 1990 Basics of Qualitative Research - grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE, Newbury Park
18. PREP and You. 1997;UKCC, London.
19. Yataoka-Yahiro M, Saylor C. A critical thinking model for nursing. Journal of Nursing Education. 33:1994;351-356.