Morphology and growth in convex profile facial patterns: A longitudinal study

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 334-344

  Karlsen, Alf Tor ^a   Krogstad, Olaf ^b  

^a University of Oslo ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Convex profile; Distal jaw base relationship; Females; Longitudinal

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FACIAL BONE; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; SKULL BASE; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; REFERENCE VALUES; SKULL BASE; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0033174331     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Björk A. The face in profile. Lund, Sweden: Berlingska Boktryckeriet, 1947.
2. Lande MJ. Growth behavior of the human bony facial profile as revealed by serial cephalometric roentgenology. Angle Orthod 1952;22:78-90.
3. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984;86:449-469.
4. Kerr WJS, Hirst D. Craniofacial characteristics of children with normal and postnormal occlusions: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987;92:207-212.
5. Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: A comparative study in children. Angle Orthod 1997;67:111-120.
6. Broadbent BH Sr, Broadbent BH Jr, Golden WH. Standards of dentofacial developmental growth. St. Louis: Mosby, 1975.
7. Tanner JM. Growth at adolescence, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd, 1962.
8. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types. Am J Orthod 1985;88:466-502.
9. Björk A. Variationer i kaebernes relation til det övrige kranium. In: Lundström A, ed. Nordisk lärobok i odontologisk ortopedi. Stockholm, Sveriges Tandläkareförbunds Förlagsförening u.p.a., 1958.
10. Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthod 1981;51:115-150.
11. Bhatia SN, Leighton BC. A manual of facial growth. Oxford Medical Publications, 1993.
12. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen & Ulvin Ltd, 1940.
13. Dixon WJ. BMDP. Statistical software. University of California, 1981.
14. Drelich RC. A cephalometric study of untreated Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1948;18:70-75.
15. Nelson WE, Higley LB. The length of mandibular basal bone in normal occlusion and Class I malocclusion compared to Cass II, division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1948;34:610-617.
16. Renfroe EW. A study of the facial patterns associated with Class I, Class II division 1, and Class II division 2 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1948;19:12-15.
17. Gilmore WA. Morphology of the adult mandible in Class II, division 1 malocclusion and in excellent occlusion. Angle Orthod 1950;20:137-146.
18. Craig CE. The skeletal patterns characteristic of Class I and Class II, division 1 malocclusion in norma lateralis. Angle Orthod 1951;21:44-56.
19. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1952;22:142-145.
20. Blair ESA. A cephalometric roentgenographic appraisal of the skeletal morphology of Class I, Class II, division 1, and Cass II, division 2 (Angle) malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1954;24: 106-119.
21. Henry RG. A classification of Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1957;27:83-92.
22. Hitchcock HP. A cephalometric description of Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1973;63:414-423.
23. McNamara JA Jr. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981;51:177-202.
24. Karlsen AT. Craniofacial morphology in children with Angle Class II-1 malocclusion with and without deepbite. Angle Orthod 1994;64:437-446.
25. Altemus LA. Horizontal and vertical dentofacial relationships in normal and Class II, division 1 malocclusion in girls 11-15 years. Angle Orthod 1955;25:120-137.
26. Rothstein TL. Facial morphology and growth from 10 to 14 years of age in children presenting Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a comparative roentgenographic cephalometric study. Am J Orthod 1971;60:619-620 (abstr.).
27. Rosenblum RE. Class II malocclusion: mandibular retrusion or maxillary protrusion? Angle Orthod 1995;65:49-62.
28. Karlsen AT. Craniofacial characteristics in children with Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion combined with extreme deep bite. Angle Orthod 1994;64:123-130.
29. Karlsen AT. Longitudinal changes in Class I subjects with moderate mandibular skeletal protrusion. Angle Orthod 1998;68(5):431-438.
30. Hellman M. The face and occlusion of the teeth in man. Int J Orthod 1927;23:859-892.
31. Sanborn RT. Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1955;25:208-222.
32. Hovell JH. The relationship of the orofacial musculature to occlusion. Current British thought. In, Kraus BS, Riedel RA, eds.Vistas in orthodontics. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1962.
33. Nicol WA. The relationship of the lip line to the incisor teeth. Dent Pract 1955;6:12-17.
34. Björk A. Cranial base development. Am J Orthod 1955;41:198-225.