Sovereignty and universal service: Sacred cows in the satellite industry

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 557-568

  Wright, David ^a  

^a Inmarsat Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; FEES AND CHARGES; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PUBLIC POLICY; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

GLOBALIZATION; SATELLITE INDUSTRY; TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY; UNIVERSAL SERVICE OBLIGATIONS (USO);

SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 0033170388     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-5961(99)00041-5     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. European Commission (EC). (1998a). Fourth Report on the implementation of the telecommunications regulatory package, Brussels. www.ispo.cec.be/infosoc/telecompolicy/en/comm-en.htm.
2. European Commission (EC). (1998b). Market access: problems and solutions. Report of the Satellite Action Plan Regulatory Working Group, Brussels. www.ispo.cec.be/infosoc/telecompolicy/en/study-en.htm.
3. European Telecommunication Office (ETO). (1997). The licensing of satellite networks and services.
4. European Union (EU). (1997). Directive of the Parliament and of the Council of 10 April 1997 on a common framework for general authorisations and individual licences in the field of telecommunications services (97/13/EC: OJ L 117, 07.05.97).
5. Harris, S. B. (1998). Satellites and subsidies. Satellite Communications, December.
6. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (1998a). General trends in telecommunication reform. Geneva.
7. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (1998b). World Telecommunication Development Report: Universal access: World telecommunication indicators. Geneva.
8. Le Goueff, S. (1998). Satellite communications: Market access in the European Union. Computer and Telecommunications Law Review (CTLR), Issue 7, 242-246.
9. Xavier, P. (1998). The licensing of telecommunication suppliers. Telecommunications Policy, 22(6), 483-492.