Investment view of mobile telecommunications in the European Union

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 521-538

  Gruber, Harald ^a  

^a EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; FINANCE; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MARKETING; PUBLIC POLICY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

INVESTMENT; TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY;

MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 0033170355     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-5961(99)00042-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Business Week (1999). A cell phone in every pocket? January 18, 30-31.
2. Calhoun, G. (1998). Digital cellular radio. Norwood, MA: Artech House.
3. Commission of the European Communities, (1998). Third Report on the implementation of the telecommunications regulatory package. COM 80 of 18.02.1998.
4. Cramton P.C. Money out of thin air. The nationwide narrowband PCS auction. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 4:1995;267-343.
5. Commission of the European Communities, (1994). Towards the personal communications environment: Green Paper on a common approach to mobile and personal communications in the European Union: COM(94) 145 final, 27.04.1994.
6. European Council (1998). Common Position (EC) no. 52/98 of 24.09.1998.
7. European Information Technology Observatory (EITO) (1998). http://www.fgi.@publikationen/eito1998/html.
8. Financial Times (1997). "US Spectrum", 2 September.
9. Financial Times (1998). US switches on its mobile phone: Americans are behind in an information age. 26 February.
10. Gruber H., Hoenicke M. The road ahead towards third generation mobile telecommunications. INFO. 1(3):1999;252-263.
11. Gruber, H., & Verboven, F. (1999). The diffusion of mobile telecommunications services in the European Union. CEPR Discussion paper No. 2054.
12. Hausman, J., (1997). Valuing the effect of regulation on new services in telecommunication. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1-38.
13. Merrill Lynch (1998). Report on Sonera, September.
14. Ministry of Transport and Communications of Finland, Telecommunications Statistics (1998), Helsinki.
15. Nattermann P.M., Murphy D.D. The Finnish telecommunications advantage in local access incumbency. Telecommunications Policy. 22(9):1998;757-773.
16. OECD (1995). Mobile cellular communication. Pricing strategies and competition. Paris.
17. Parker P.M., Röller L.H. Collusive conduct in Duopolies. Multimarket contact and cross-ownership in the mobile telephone industry RAND Journal of Economics. 28(2):1997;304-322.
18. Schenk, K. E., Müller, J., & Schnöring, T. (Eds.). (1995) Mobile telecommunications: Emerging European markets. Norwood, MA: Artech House.
19. Valletti T., Cave M. Competition in UK mobile communications. Telecommunications Policy. 22(2):1998;109-131.