Modern alternatives to amalgam: Cementable restorations and inlays

Quintessence International

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 551-556

  Wirz, Jakob ^a,b   Jaeger, Kurt ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b c/o Ms Katharina Everett ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Electroforming; Indirect restoration; Inlay; Onlay

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; BIOMATERIAL; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOMER; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; GOLD ALLOY; RESIN; TITANIUM; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CEMENTATION; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; INLAYS; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; TITANIUM; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0033169766     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Wirz J. Clinical Material Science. Berlin: Quintessenz, 1993.
2. Wirz J, Jaeger K. Filling material science. Quintessenz 1994;45:1721-1729.
3. Wirz J, Jaeger K, Schmidli F. Electroformed restorations with high biocompatibility. Quintessenz 1995;46:539-547.
4. Behrend F. Gold electroforming: GES restorations. Dental Technol 1997;3.
5. Rogers OW, Armstrong BW. Electroforming a gold matrix for indirect inlays. Aust Dent J 1961;11:959-966.
6. Roger OW. The type of union between cast gold and an electroformed gold matrix in an inlay technique. Aust Dent J 1976;1:479-487.
7. Diedrich G, Rosenhain P. Galvanoforming-Bio-Esthetics in der Restaurative Dental Medicine. Munich: Neur Merkur, 1995.
8. Magne P, Dietschi D, Holz J. Esthetic posterior restorations: Practical and clinical considerations. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1996;16:105-119.
9. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Geurtsen W. Sind Keramik-Inlays und Veneers wissenschaflich anerkannt? Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994;49:197-208.
10. Wirz J, Jaeger K, Schmidli F. Modern electroforming technology. New ways with biocompatible, cementable ceramic restorations. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1996;106: 643-651.
11. Jaeger K, Henz B, Wirz J, Graber G. Marginal fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100: 1304-1309.
12. Bebermyer RD, Berg JH. Comparison of patient-perceived postcementation sensitivity with glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate cements. Quintessence Int 1994;25:209-214.
13. Setz J, Diehl J, Weber H. The marginal fit of cemented galvano-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:61-64.
14. Somers GA, Biau J. Clinical applications of electroformed gold alloy. Plating Surface Finishing 1988;Mar:42-46.
15. Tuerk F. Marginal Fit of Bonded and Cemented Ceramic Fillings - A Comparison In Vitro Study [thesis]. Basel, Switzerland:1996.
16. Canay S, Oktemer M. In vitro corrosion behavior of 13 prosthodontic alloys. Quintessence Int 1992;23:279-287.