Theorizing the flip side of civic journalism: Democratic citizenship and ethical readership

Communication Theory

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 321-345

  Schroll, Christopher J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033169307     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00173.x     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Allen, D. S. (1995a). Democracy and American journalism: From theory to practice. New York: Project on Public Life and the Press.
2. Allen, D. S. (1995b). Communicative ethics and public journalism: A movement in search of an ethical standard. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association national convention, San Antonio, TX.
3. Alterman, E. (1992). Sound and fury: The Washington punditocracy and the collapse of American politics. New York: Harper Collins.
4. Anderson, R., Dardenne, R., & Killenberg, G. M. (1997). The American newspaper as the public conversational commons. In J. Black (Ed.), Mixed news: The public/civic/communitarian journalism debate (pp. 96-115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Anderson, R., Dardenne, R., & Killenberg, G. M. (1994). The conversation of journalism: Communication, community, and news. Westport, CT: Praeger.
6. Barnhurst, K. G., & Wartella, E. (1991). Newspapers and citizenship: Young adults' subjective experience of newspapers. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 8, 195-209.
7. Bitzer, L. (1978). Rhetoric and public knowledge. In D. M. Burks (Ed.), Rhetoric, philosophy, and literature: An exploration, (pp. 67-93). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
8. Black, J. (Ed.). (1997). Mixed news: The public/civic/communitarian journalism debate. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Bogart, L. (1981). Press and public: Who reads what, when, where, and why in American newspapers. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Booth, W. (1988). The company we keep: An ethics of fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Carey, J. W. (1987, March). The press and public discourse. Center Magazine, 4-16.
12. Charity, A. (1995). Doing public journalism. New York: Guilford.
13. Charity, A. (1996, Jan.-Feb). Reluctant sea change. Quill, 23-27.
14. Christians, C. (1988). Can the public be held accountable? Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 3, 50-58.
15. Christians, C., Ferré, J. P., & Fackler, M. (1993). Good news: Social ethics and the press. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Condit, C. (1989). The rhetorical limits of polysemy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6, 103-122.
17. Dauenhauer, B. (1996). Citizenship in a fragile world. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
18. Dionne, E. J. (1991). Why Americans hate politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
19. Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20. Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21. Fallows, J. (1996). Breaking the news: How the media undermine American democracy. New York: Pantheon Books.
22. Farrell, T. (1976). Knowledge, consensus, and rhetorical theory. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, 1-14.
23. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretative communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Fishkin. J. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Freund, E. (1987). The return of the reader: Reader-response criticism. London: Methuen.
26. Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Fullinwider, M. (1995). Citizenship, individualism and democratic politics. Ethics, 105, 497-515.
28. Galston, W. (1980). Justice and the human good. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Glasser, T. L., & Ettema, J. S. (1989). Investigative journalism and the moral order. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6, 1-20.
30. Glasser, T. L., & Ettema, J. S. (1994). When the facts don't speak for themselves: A study of the use of irony in daily journalism. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10, 322-338.
31. Glasser, T. L. (1991). Communication and the cultivation of citizenship. Communication, 12, 235-248.
32. Griffin, C. (1996). The essentialist roots of the public sphere: A feminist critique. Western Journal of Communication, 60, 40-56.
33. Gunaratne, S. A. (1997). Old wine in a new bottle: Public journalism, developmental journalism and social responsibility. In M. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 21 (pp. 277-321). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Gutmann, A., & D. Thompson. (1990). Moral conflict and political consensus. Ethics, 101, 64-88.
35. Habermas, J. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, 1, 49-55.
36. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, Vols. I & II. (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
37. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Habermas, J. (1995). Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls' political liberalism. Journal of Philosophy, 97, 109-131.
39. Hall, S. (1975). Introduction. In A. C. H. Smith, Paper voices: The popular press and social change, 1935-1965 (pp. 11-24). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
40. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128-138). London: Hutchinson.
41. Hall, S. (1985). Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2, 91-114.
42. Hardt, H. (1979). The conscience of society: Max Weber on journalism and responsibility. In H. Hardt, Social theories of the press. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43. Hauser, G. (1997). Civil society and the principle of the public sphere. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 31, 19-40.
44. Hoyt, M. (1995). Are you now, or will you ever be, a civic journalist? Columbia Journalism Review, September-October, 27-33.
45. Huspek, M., & Kendall, K. (1991). On withholding political voice: An analysis of the political vocabulary of a "nonpolitical" speech community. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77, 1-19.
46. Irwin, T. (1985). Glossary. In Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics. T. Irwin (Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
47. Janowitz, M. (1967). The community press in an urban setting: The social elements of urbanism (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Kennedy, G. (Trans.). (1991). Aristotle on rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49. Kenney, R. J. (1997). "South of haven": A community in conversation with itself. In J. Black (Ed.), Mixed news: The public/civic/communitarian journalism debate (pp. 118-119). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Killenberg, G. M., & Anderson, R. (1993). What is a quote? Practical, rhetorical and ethical concerns for journalists. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 8, 37-54.
51. McCombs, M., & Poindexter, P. (1983). The duty to keep informed: News exposure and civic obligation. Journal of Communication, 33, 88-96.
52. Means, R. (1969). The ethical imperative. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
53. Merritt, D. (1995a). Public journalism and public life: Why telling the news is not enough. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
54. Merritt, D. (1995b). Public journalism - defining a democratic art. Media Studies Journal, 9, 125-132.
55. Merritt, D., & McMasters, P. (1996). Merritt and McMasters debate public journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 11, 173-183.
56. Mondak, J. J. (1995). Nothing to read: Newspapers and elections in a social experiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
57. Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love's knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58. Nussbaum, M. (1996). Poetic justice: The literary imagination in public life. Boston: Beacon Press.
59. Nussbaum, M. C., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (1992). The quality of life. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
60. Peters, J. D. (1989). Democracy and American mass communication theory: Dewey, Lippmann, and Lazarsfeld. Communication, 11, 199-220.
61. Peters, J. D., & Cmiel, K. (1991). Media ethics and the public sphere. Communication, 12, 197-215.
62. Peterson, T. (1956). The social responsibility theory of the press. In F. S. Siebert, T. Peterson, & W. Schramm (Eds.), Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility, and soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do (pp. 73-103). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
63. Radway, J. (1985). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
64. Radway, J. (1986). Identifying ideological seams: Mass culture, analytical method, and political practice. Communication, 9, 93-123.
65. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
66. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
67. Rawls, J. (1995). Reply to Habermas. Journal of Philosophy, 92, 132-180.
68. Rosen, J. (1991). Making journalism more public. Communication, 12, 267-284.
69. Rosen, J. (1992). Politics, vision, and the press: Toward a public agenda for journalism. In S. Charlé, (Ed.), The new news v. the old news: The press and politics in the 1990s (pp. 3-33). New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
70. Rosen, J. (1993). Community connectedness: Passwords for public journalism. St. Petersburg, FL: Poynter Institute for Media Studies.
71. Rosen, J. (1994). Making things more public: On the political responsibility of the media intellectual. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 11, 363-388.
72. Rothenbuhler, E., Mullen, L. J., DeLaurell, R., & Ryu, C. R. (1996). Communication, community attachment, and involvement. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 445-466.
73. Schroll, C. (1999). The place of "conversation" in the omnilogue of democracy: A response to Schudson. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 16, 99-106.
74. Schudson, M. (1988). What is a reporter? The private face of public journalism. In J. Carey (Ed.), Media, myths and narratives: Television and the press (pp. 228-245). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
75. Schudson, M. (1997). Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14, 297-309.
76. Stamm, K. R. (1985). Newspaper use and community ties: Toward a dynamic theory. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
77. Tapping civic life: How to report first, and best, what's happening in your community. (1996). Washington, DC: Pew Center for Civic Journalism.
78. Taylor, P. (1992). Political coverage in the 1990s: Teaching the old news new tricks. In S. Charlé, (Ed.). The new news v. the old news: The press and politics in the 1990s (pp. 37-69). New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
79. de Tocqueville, A. (1835/1966). Democracy in America. (J. P. Mayer & M. Lerner, Eds., & G. Lawrence, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1835.)
80. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
81. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.
82. Walzer, M. (1997). On toleration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
83. Wander, P. (1984). The third persona: An ideological turn in rhetorical theory. Central States Speech Journal, 35, 197-216.
84. Wander, P. (1990). The politics of despair. Communication, 11, 277-290.
85. White, J. B. (1990). Justice as translation: An essay in cultural and legal criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86. Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87. Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
88. Young, I. M. (1997a). Asymmetrical reciprocity: On moral respect, wonder and enlarged thought. In I. M. Young, Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy and policy (pp. 38-59). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
89. Young, I. M. (1997b). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In I. M. Young, Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy and policy (pp. 60-74). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.