Application of an in vitro model to evaluate bioadhesion of fibroblasts and epithelial cells to two different dressings

Biomaterials

Volumn 20, Issue 13, 1999, Pages 1237-1244

  Cochrane, Christine ^a   Rippon, Mark G ^b   Rogers, Alan ^b   Walmsley, Rob ^b   Knottenbelt, Derek ^a   Bowler, Phil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b Deeside Industrial Estate   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bioadhesion; Dressings; Epithelial cells; Fibroblasts; Wound fluid

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; CELLS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

BIOADHESION; WOUND DRESSINGS;

BIOMATERIALS;

BIOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPITHELIUM CELL; FIBER; FIBROBLAST; GEL; HORSE; ISOTOPE LABELING; NONHUMAN; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SKIN SURFACE; TISSUE INJURY; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIVISION; CELLS, CULTURED; COLLAGEN; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; GELS; HORSES; KERATINOCYTES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS; PLASTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0033168259     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00025-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cohen IK. Normal healing: Parameters to measure. Technologies to Assess Wound Healing, Pre-conference Workshop Abstracts. San Francisco, 1994:4-11.
2. Carver N, Leigh IM. Synthetic dressings. Int J Dermatol 1992;32:10-8.
3. Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. The wound healing process. Dermatol Clin 1993;11(4):629-40.
4. McDaniel DH, Ash K, Lord J, Newman J, Zukowski M. Accelerated laser resurfacing wound healing using a triad of topical antioxidants. Dermatol Surg 1998;24(6):661-4.
5. Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM. New method for assessing epidermal wound healing: The effects of triamcinolone acetonide and polyethylene film occlusion. JID 1978;71:382-4.
6. Cochrane C. Models in vivo of wound healing in the horse and the role of growth factors. Vet Derm 1997;8:259-72.
7. Thomas S. Low adherence dressings. J Wound Care 1994;3:27-30.
8. Herrick SE, Ireland GW, Simon D, McCollum CN, Ferguson MWJ. Venous ulcer fibroblasts compared with normal fibroblasts show differences in collagen but not fibronectin production under normal and hypoxic conditions. JID 1996;106(1):187-91.
9. Desmouliere A, Gabbiani G. In: Clarke RAF, Henson PM, editors. The Molecular and Cell Biology of Wound Repair. London: Plenum Press, 1996:391-414.
10. Scales JT, Winter GD. The adhesion of dressings an experimental study. Wound Healing (Proc of a Symposium Held on 12-13 Nov 1959) New York: Pergamon Press, 1961:54-61.
11. Buchanan IA, Andrews JK, Lang SM. Clinical and laboratory investigation of the composition and properties of human skin wound exudate under semi-permeable dressings. Burns 1982;7: 326-33.
12. Rogers A, Rippon MG, Bowler P, Lydon MJL. Differential adsorption of serum-derived proteins by wound contact dressings. EWMA 1998:30.
13. COchrane C, Rippon M, Rogers A, Walmsley R, Bowler P, KnotTenbelt D. In vitro evaluation of dressing adhesion to wounds: A biological perspective. EWMA 1998:31.
14. Waring M. In vitro assessment of the MultiDRESS range against UK competitors for drug tariff submission. Internal Report WHRI 1958 PT004, April 1997.
15. Clarke RAF. Overview and general considerations of wound repair. In: Clarke RAF, Henson PM, editors. The Molecular and Cell Biology of Wound Repair. 1996:3-23.
16. Bartoletti P. Adherent dressings in the treatment of chronic wounds. J Wound Care 1998;7(4-suppl):7.
17. COchrane C, Rippon MG, Knottenbelt DC. Evaluation of cell adhesion to dressings. Presented at 7th European Conf on Advances in Wound Management. Harrogate, 1997.
18. Navarro Soto S. Adherent dressings in the treatment of acute wounds. J Wound Care 1998;7(4-suppl):7.