Quantitative assessment of bladder carcinoma by acid labile DNA assay

Cancer

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 105-113

  Gschwendtner, Andreas ^a   Mairinger, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Acid labile DNA; Bladder carcinoma; Carcinoma monitoring; Image analysis

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CARCINOMA; CANCER CELL; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DNA CONTENT; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYDROLYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY;

CARCINOMA, TRANSITIONAL CELL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DNA, NEOPLASM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; PAPILLOMA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0033168018     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990701)86:1<105::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO;2-F     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Keller JW, McCune CS, Sahasrabhe DM. Urologic and male genital cancers. In: Rubin P, editor. Clinical oncology, a multidisciplinary approach for physicians and students. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 1993:425-32.
2. Devonec M, Darzynkiewicz Z, Kostryka-Claps ML, Collste LL, Whitmore WF, Melamed MR. Flow cytometry of low stage bladder tumors: correlation with cytologic and cystoscopic diagnosis. Cancer 1982;49:109-18.
3. Oosterlinch W, Kurth KH, Schröder F, Sylvester R, Hammond B. A plea for cold biopsy, fulguration and immediate bladder instillation with Epirubicin in small superficial bladder tumors. Data from the EOURTC GU Group study 30863. Eur Urol 1993;23:457-9.
4. Badalament R, Kimmel M, Gay H, Cibas E, Whitmore W Jr., Herr H, et al. The sensitivity of flow cytometry compared with conventional cytology in the detection of superficial bladder carcinoma. Cancer 1987;59:2078-85.
5. Kirollos MM, McDermott S, Bradbrook RA. The performance characteristics of the bladder tumour antigen test. Br J Urol 1997;80:30-4.
6. Pariente JL, Bordenave L, Michael P, Latapie MJ, Ducassou D, Le Guillou M. Initial evaluation of CYFRA-21-1 diagnostic performances as a urinary marker in bladder transitional cell carcinoma. J Urol 1997;158:338-41.
7. Golijanin D, Sherman Y, Shapiro A, Pode D. Detection of bladder tumors by immunostaining of the Lewis X antigen in cells from voided urine. Urology 1995;46:173-7.
8. Attallah AM, el-Didi M, Seif F, el-Mohamady H, Dalbagni G. Comparative study between cytology and dot-ELISA for early detection of bladder cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 105:109-14.
9. Steiner G, Schoenberg MP, Linn JF, Mao L, Sidransky D. Detection of bladder cancer recurrence by microsatellite analysis of urine. Nature Med 1997;3:621-4.
10. Cajulis RS, Haines GK III, Frias-Hidvegi D, McVary K. Interphase cytogenetics as an adjunct in the cytodiagnosis of urinary bladder carcinoma. A comparative study of cytology, flow cytometry and interphase cytogenetics in bladder washes. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1994;16:1-10.
11. Wheeless LL, Badalament RA, deVere White RW, Fradet Y, Tribukait B. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in bladder cancer. Cytometry 1993;14:478-81.
12. Richman AM, Mayne ST, Jekel JF, Albertsen P. Image analysis combined with visual cytology in the early detection of recurrent bladder carcinoma. Cancer 1998;82:1738-48.
13. Zelenin AV, Kushch AA, Cherbance TA. Peculiarities of cytochemical properties of cancer cells as revealed by study of deoxyribonucleoprotein susceptibility to feulgen hydrolysis. J Histochem Cytochem 1977;25:580-4.
14. Sincock AM. Semiautomated measurement of rapidly hydrolyzed DNA in the diagnosis of mammary carcinoma. Cancer 1986;57:1-5.
15. Soames JV, Macleod RI, Kelly PJ. Feulgen hydrolysis profiles and acid labile DNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1995;31b:222-6.
16. Millett JA, Husain O, Bitensky L, Chayen J. Feulgen hydrolysis profiles in cells exfoliated from the cervix uteri: potential aid in the diagnosis of malignancy. J Clin Pathol 1982; 35:345-9.
17. Sincock AM. Semi-automated diagnosis of cervical intraeopithelial neoplasia Grade 2 by the measurement of acid labile DNA in cytologically normal nuclei. Cancer 1986;58: 83-6.
18. Sincock AM, Partington CK, Evans-Jones J, Steele SJ. Quantitative assessment of cervical neoplasia by hydrolysed DNA assay. Lancet 1987;2:942-3.
19. Partington CK, Sincock AM, Steele SJ. Quantitative determination of acid-labile DNA in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer 1991;67:3104-9.
20. Garner DM, Harrison A, MacAulay C, Palcic B. Cyto-Savant and its use in automated screening of cervical smears. In: Wied GL, Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL, Schenck U, editors. Compendium on the computerized cytology and histology laboratory. Tutorials of cytology. Chicago: 1994:346-52.
21. Bocking A, Giroud F, Reith A. Consensus report of the ESACP task force on standardization of diagnostic DNA image cytometry. Anal Cell Pathol 1995;8:67-74.
22. Garcia AM. Studies on DNA in leukocytes and the related cells of mammals: VI. The Feulgen-DNA content of rabbit leukocytes after hypotonic treatment. J Histochem Cytochem 1969;17:47-55.
23. Rasch RW, Rasch EM. Kinetics of hydrolysis during the Feulgen reaction for deoxiribinucleic acid: a re-evaluation. J Histochem Cytochem 1973;21:1053-65.
24. Duijndam WAL, Van Duijn P. The influence of chromatin compactness on the stoechiometry of the Feulgen-Schiff procedure studied on model films: 11. Investigations on films containing condensed or swollen chicken erythrocyte nuclei. J Histochem Cytochem 1967;23:891-900.
25. Hewish DR, Burgoyne LA. Chromatin structure: the digestion of chromatin DNA at regularly spaced sited by a nuclear DNAse. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1973;52:504-10.
26. Chambers SAM, Cognetti G, Shaw BR. Diffusible factors are responsible for differences in nuclease sensitivity among chromatins originating from different cell types. Exp Cell Res 1984;154:213-23.
27. Koss LG, Bartels PH, Bibbo M, Freed SZ, Taylor J, Wied GL. Computer discrimination between benign and malignant urothelial cells. Acta Cytol 1975;19:378-91.