Habitat segregation of C3 and CAM Nidularium (Bromeliaceae) in response to different light regimes in the understory of a swamp forest in southeastern Brazil

Flora

Volumn 194, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 281-288

  Scarano, F R ^a   De Mattos, E A ^b   Franco, A C ^c   Herzog, B ^d   Ball, E ^d   Grams, T E E ^e   Mantovani, A ^a   Barreto, S ^a   Haag Kerwer, A ^f   Luttge U ^d  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^d DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^e Natl Res Ctr Environ and Hlth   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Atlantic rain forest; Fluorescence quenching; Habitat specialization; Photoinhibition; Swamp forest; Tank bromeliads

Indexed keywords

EPIPHYTE; HABITAT USE; NICHE PARTITIONING; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SWAMP FOREST; UNDERSTORY;

NIDULARIUM; NIDULARIUM INNOCENTII; NIDULARIUM PROCERUM;

EID: 0033166386     PISSN: 03672530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30915-5     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BALL, M. C., BUTTERWORTH, J. A., RODEN, J. S., CRISTIAN, R., & EGERTON, J. J. G. (1995): Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence to forest ecology. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22: 311-319.
2. BILGER, W., SCHREIBER, U., & BOCK, M. (1995): Determination of the quantum efficiency of photosystem II and of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in the field. Oecologia 102: 425-432.
3. 2-evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 170: 489-504.
4. BRÄNDLE, R. A. (1991): Flooding resistance of rhizomatous amphibious plants. In: JACKSON, M. B., DAVIES, D. D., & LAMBERS, H. (eds.): Plant life under oxygen deprivation. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, 35-46.
5. CRAWFORD, R. M. M. (1987): Rhizome anoxia-tolerance and habitat specialization in wetland plants. In: CRAWFORD, R. M. M. (ed): Plant life in aquatic and amphibious habitats. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 397-410.
6. CRAWFORD, R. M. M. (1992): Oxygen as an ecological limit to plant distribution. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23: 93-185.
7. GENTY, B., BRIANTAIS, J. M., & BAKER, N. R. (1989): The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 990: 87-92.
8. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal (1981): Piano de Manejo - Reserva Biològica de Poço das Antas. Brasília.
9. 3 and CAM forms of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. J. Exp. Bot., 45: 325-334.
10. KOOTEN, O. VAN & SNEIL, J. F. H. (1990): The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynt. Res. 25: 147-150.
11. KRAUSE, G. H. (1988): Photoinhibition of photosynthesis. An evaluation of damaging and protective mechanisms. Physiol. Plant. 74: 566-574.
12. WEIS, E. (1991): Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 42: 313-349.
13. LEITÃO-FILHO, H. F. (1993): Ecologia da Mata Atlântica em Cubatão. Editora Unesp, Editora Unicamp, São Paulo.
14. MARTIN, C. E. (1994): Physiological ecology of the Bromeliaceae. Bot. Rev. 60: 1-82.
15. 3-CAM epiphyte Guzmania monostachia var. monostachia to tropical seasonal transitions under field conditions. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22: 771-781.
16. BORLAND, A. M., BROADMEADOW, M. S. J., & MCDAVID, C. R. (1992): Photoinhibitory responses of the epiphytic bromeliad Guzmania monostachia during the dry season in Trinidad maintain photochemical integrity under adverse conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 15: 37-47.
17. 1-CAM epiphyte Guzmania monostachia: gas-exchange characteristics, photochemical efficiency and the xantophyll cycle. Funct. Ecol. 8: 746-754.
18. 2 uptake in the Bromeliaceae, Orchidaceae and Euphorbiaceae. Bot. Gaz. 131: 285-290.
19. 2 fixation in Bromeliaceae. Flora 166: 137-152.
20. MÖLLERING, H. (1974): L(-) Malate. In: BERGMEYER, H. U. (ed.): Methoden der enzymatischen Analyse. Vol. 2. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1636-1639.
21. OSMOND, C. B. (1994). What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparisons of shade and sun plants. In: BAKER, N. R. & BOWYER, J. R. (eds.): Photoinhibition of photosynthesis - from molecular mechanism to the field. Bios Scientific, Oxford, 1-24.
22. GRACE, S. C. (1995): Perspectives on photoinhibition and photorespiration in the field: quintessential inefficiencies of the light and dark reactions of photosynthesis? J. Exp. Bot. 46 (special issue): 1351-1362.
23. ZIEGLER, H., STICHLER, W., & TRIMBORN, P. (1975): Carbon isotope discrimination in alpine succulent plants supposed to be capable of crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM). Oecologia 18: 209-217.
24. PITTENDRIGH, C. S. (1948): The bromeliad-Anopheles-malaria complex in Trinidad. I. The bromeliad flora. Evolution 2: 58-89.
25. SCARANO, F. R., RIBEIRO, K. T., MORAES, L. F. D., & LIMA, H. C. (1997): Plant establishment on flooded and non-flooded patches of a swamp forest in southeastern Brazil. J. Trop. Ecol. 13: 799-809.
26. SCHREIBER, U. & BILGER, W. (1993): Progress in chlorophyll fluorescence research: major developments during the last years in retrospect. Progr. Bot. 54: 151-173.
27. SMITH, J. A. C. (1989): Epiphytic bromeliads. In: LÜTTGE, U. (ed.): Vascular plants as epiphytes. Springer, Berlin, 109-138.
28. 3 bromeliads I. The ecology of the Bromeliaceae in Trinidad. Plant Cell Environ. 9: 359-376.
29. SMITH, L. B. & DOWNS, R. J. (1979): Bromelioideae (Bromeliaceae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 14 (3): 1493-2142.