An interactive procedure for multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete information

Computers and Operations Research

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 755-772

  Kim, Soung Hie ^a   Han, Chang Hee ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING;

MULTI-ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKING (MAGDM);

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER SYSTEM; DECISION MAKING; PLANNING METHOD;

EID: 0033166048     PISSN: 03050548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0548(98)00091-4     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
2. Fishburn PC. Analysis of decisions with incomplete knowledge of probabilities. Operations Research 1965;13:217-37.
3. Weber M. Decision making with incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research 1987;28:44-57.
4. Hazen GB. Partial information, dominance and potential optimality in multiattribute utility theory. Operations Research 1986;34/2:296-310.
5. Salo AA, Hamalainen RP. Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statement. Operations Research 1992;40/6:1053-61.
6. Park KS, Kim SH, Yoon WC. An extended model for establishing dominance in multiattribute decision making. Journal of Operational Research Society 1996;47:1415-20.
7. Kmietoicz ZW, Pearman AD. Decision theory, linear partial information and statistical dominance. Omega 1984;12:391-9.
8. Anandaligam G. A multiagent multiattribute approach for conflict resolution in acid rain impact mitigation. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1989;19:1142-53.
9. Salo AA. Interactive decision aiding for group decision support. European Journal of Operational Research 1995;84:134-49.
10. Kim SH, Ahn BS. Group decision making procedure considering preference strength under incomplete information. Computers & Operations Research 1997;24/12:1101-12.
11. Ramanathan R, Ganesh LS. Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and intrinsic process for deriving member's weight ages. European Journal of Operational Research 1994;79:249-265.
12. Weber M. A method of multiattribute decision making with incomplete information. Management Science 1985;31/11:1365-71.
13. Hwang CL, Lin MJ. Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Lecture Notes in Economic and Mathematical Systems. New York: Springer, 1986.
14. Park KS, Kim SH. Establishing strict dominance between alternatives with special type of incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research 1996;96:398-406.
15. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, New York: Wiley, 1976.
16. Dyer JS, Sarin RK. Group preferences aggregation rules based on strength of preference. Management Science 25(9):1979.
17. Park KS, Kim SH. Tools for interactive multiattribute decision making with incompletely identified information. European Journal of Operational Research 1997;98:111-123.