A Histomorphometric Study of Tissue Interface by Laminar Implant Test in Rats

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 565-570

  Guglielmotti, María Beatríz ^a   Renou, Sandra ^a   Cabrini, Rómulo Luis ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Experimental implants; Histomorphometry; Interface; Osseointegration

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; BIOMATERIAL; CARBON; DIAMOND; METAL; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE MATRIX; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; DISEASE MODEL; FOLLOW UP; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMPLANTATION; MALE; PATHOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; WISTAR RAT;

ALUMINUM; ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; BONE MATRIX; CARBON; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DIAMOND; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; METALS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0033161185     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Van Noort R. Titanium: The implant material of today. J Mater Sci 1987;22:3801-3811.
2. Brunski JB, Baier RE, Pilliar RE. Basis science consensus panel. In: Laney WR, Tolman DA (eds). Tissue Integration in Oral, Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Reconstruction. Chicago: Quintessence, 1992:381-384.
3. Stanford CM, Keller JC, Solursh M. Bone cell expression on titanium surfaces is altered by sterilization treatments. J Dent Res 1994;73(5):1061-1071.
4. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5: 202-206.
5. Steflik DE, Parr GR, Sisk AL, Lake FT, Hanes PJ. Histomorphometry of the dental implant-bone interface: One-year results of a comparative investigation in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:501-512.
6. Brunski JB. The influence of force, motion, and related quantities on the response of bone to implants. In: Fitzgerald R (ed). Noncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. New York: Raven Press, 1988:43-47.
7. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:567-572.
8. Baier RE, Meyer AE, Natiella JR. Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: Methods and results. J Biomed Mater Res 1984;18:327-355.
9. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA. Dental implant design - effect on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:467-483.
10. Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. A light and electron microscopic study of the effects of surface topography on the behavior of cells attached to titanium-coated percutaneous implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:387-405.
11. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L. Direct bone anchorage of oral implants: Clinical and experimental considerations of the concept of osseointegration. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3: 30-41.
12. Cabrini RL, Guglielmotti MB, Almagro JC. Histomorphometry of initial bone healing around zirconium implants in rats. Implant Dent 1993;2:264-267.
13. Linder L. Osseointegration of metallic implants in animals and humans [discussion]. In: Older J (ed). Implant Bone Interface. London: Springer-Verlag, 1990:43-49.
14. Evans AC, Franks J, Revell PJ. Diamond-like carbon applied to bioengineering materials. Surf Coat Tech 1991; 17:662-667.
15. Thomson LA, Law FC, Rushton N, Franks J. Biocompatibility of diamond-like carbon coating. Biomaterials 1991; 12(1):37-40.
16. Huck H, Jech A, Halac EB, Nicolai J, Benjacar MAR de, Righini R. Mass-separated ion beam deposition of diamond-like thin films. J Nucl Instr Method Phys Res 1994; B84:62-66.
17. Weibel ER, Elias H. Introduction to stereology and morphometry. In: Weibel ER, Elias H (eds). Quantitative methods in morphology. New York: Springer Verlag 1967:3-19.
18. Guglielmotti MB, Ubios AM, Rey BM de, Cabrini RL. Effects of acute intoxication with uranyl nitrate on bone formation. Experientia 1984;40:474-476.
19. Guglielmotti MB, Ubios AM, Cabrini RL. Alveolar wound healing alteration under uranyl nitrate intoxication. J Oral Pathol 1985;14:565-572.
20. Guglielmotti MB, Ubios AM, Cabrini RL. Morphometric study of the effect of a low dose of uranium on bone healing. Acta Stereol 1987;6(2):357-366.
21. Guglielmotti MB, Ubios AM, Larumbe J, Cabrini RL. Tetracycline in uranyl nitrate intoxication: Its action on renal damage and U retention in bone. Health Physics 1989;57(3):403-405.
22. Ubios AM, Guglielmotti MB, Steimetz T, Cabrini RL. Uranium inhibits bone formation in physiologic alveolar bone modeling and remodeling. Environ Res 1991;54:17-23.
23. Mandalunis P, Guglielmotti MB, Ubios AM. Alveolar wound healing in rachitic animals. Acta Odont Latinoamer 1986;3(3-4):73-80.
24. Albrektsson T. Tissue reactions to metallic biomaterials. In: Older J (ed). Implant Bone Interface. London: Springer-Verlag 1990:35-41.
25. Johansson C, Lausmaa J, Ask M, Hansson HA, Albrektsson T. Ultrastructural differences of the interface zone between bone and Ti-6Al-4V or commercially pure titanium. J Biomed Eng 1989;11:3-8.
26. Stea S, Savarino L, Toni A, Sudanese A, Guinti A, Pizzoferrato A. Microradiographic and histochemical evaluation of mineralization inhibition at the bone-alumina interface. Biomaterials 1992;13(10):664-667.
27. Albrektsson T, Hansson HA, Ivarsson B. Interface analysis of titanium and zirconium bone implants. Biomaterials 1985;6:97-101.