Video superimposition at the C.A. pound laboratory 1987 to 1992

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 695-699

  Austin, Dana ^a  

^a Tarrant County Medical Examiner's District   (United States)

Author keywords

Forensic anthropology; Forensic science; Human identification; Photograph photograph comparison; Radiographic comparison; Skull photograph comparison; Video superimposition; William r. Maples

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; EXTERNAL EAR; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HISTORY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; LABORATORY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SKULL; VIDEORECORDING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EAR, EXTERNAL; FEMALE; FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LABORATORIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; SKULL; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 0033161010     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1520/jfs14538j     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Snow CC. A video technique for skull-face superimposition. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Washington, DC, 1976.
2. Maples WR. Forensic anthropology. In: Stimson PG, Mertz, CA, editors. Forensic dentistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1997;65-81.
3. Stahl CJ. Identification of human remains. In: Spitz WU, Fisher RS, editors. Medicolegal investigation of death. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1973;32-65.
4. Pearson K, Morant GM. The Wilkinson head of Oliver Cromwell and it's relationship to busts, masks, and painted portraits. Biometrika 1934;26:269-378.
5. Pearson K. The skull of Robert the Brace, King of Scotland, 1274-1329. Biometrika 1924; 16:253-72.
6. Pearson K. On the skull and portraits of George Buchanan. Biometrika 1926:18:233-56.
7. Glaister J, Brash JC. Medico-legal aspects of the Ruxton Case. Baltimore: William Wood and Co., 1937.
8. Prinsloo I. The identification of skeletal remains in Regina versus K and another: The Howick Falls Murder Case. J Forensic Med 1953 July-Sept.; 1(1):11-7.
9. Sekharan PC. A revised superimposition technique for identification of the individual from the skull and photograph. J Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 1971;62(1):107-13.
10. Sekharan PC. A scientific method for positioning of the skull for photography in superimposition studies. J Police Sci Admin 1973;1(2):232-40.
11. Grüner O. The identification of skulls: historical review and practical application. Proceedings of the advances in skull identification via video superimposition: An international symposium and workshop. Kiel, West Germany. August 1988.
12. Dorion RBJ. Photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1983; 28(3): 724-34.
13. Webster WP, Murray WK, Brinkhous W, Hudson P. Identification of human remains using photographic reconstruction. In: Reichs KJ, editor. Forensic osteology: advances in the identification of human remains. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1986;255-89.
14. Reddy KSN. Identification of dismembered parts: the medicolegal aspects of the Nagaraju Case. Forensic Sci 1973;2:351-74.
15. Janssens PA, Hansch CF, Voorhamme LL. Identity determination by superimposition with anthropological cranium adjustment. OSSA: J Skeletal Res 1978;5:109-22.
16. Gerjvall N-G. Superimposition plus SEM-comparison of hair cuticle for identification purposes. OSSA: J Skeletal Res 1974;1:96-9.
17. Gerjvall N-G. Unexpected identification. OSSA: J Skeletal Res 1975; 2:69-70.
18. Gerjvall N-G, Johanson G. Solving a mystery death. OSSA: J Skeletal Res 1976-77;3/4:I69-81.
19. McKenna JJI. A method of orientation of skull and camera for use in forensic photographic investigations. J Forensic Sci 1988;33(3):751-5.
20. McKenna JJI, Jablonski NG, Femhead RW. A method of matching skulls with photographic portraits using landmarks and measurements of the dentition. J Forensic Sci 1984;29(3):787-97.
21. Helmer R. Schadelidentifizierung durch elektronische Bildmischung. Heidelberg: Kriminalistik Verlag 1984.
22. Teixiera WRG. The Mengele Report. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1985; 6(4):279-83.
23. KoelmeyerTD. Videocamera superimposition and facial reconstruction as an aid to identification. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1982;3(1):45-8.
24. Bastiaan RJ, Dalitz GD, Woodward C. Video superimposition of skulls and photographic portraits-a new aid to identification. J Forensic Sci 1986;31(4): 1373-9.
25. Dong-Sheng C, Yu-Wen L, Cheng T, Run-Ji G, Yong-Chuan M, Jian-Hai F, et al. A study on the standard for forensic anthropologie identification of skull-image superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1989;34(6): 1343-56.
26. Iten PX. Identification of skulls by video superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1987;32( 1):173-88.
27. Delfino VP, Colonna M, Potente F, Introna F. Computer-aided skull/face superimposition. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1986;7(3):201-I2.
28. Nickerson BA, Fitzhorn PA, Koch SK, Charney M. A method for near-optimal computational superimposition of two-dimensional digital facial photographs and three-dimensional cranial surface meshes. J Forensic Sci 1991;36(2):480-500.
29. Ubelaker DH, Bubniak E, O'Donnell G. Computer-assisted photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1992 May;37(3):750-62.
30. Austin-Smith D, Maples WR. The reliability of skull/photograph superimposition in individual identification. J Forensic Sci 1994 Mar;39(2): 446-55.
31. Austin-Smith D, Maples WR. Photograph/photograph video superimposition in individual identification of the living. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. New Orleans, LA. February 21, 1992.
32. Caldwell PC. New questions (and some answers) on the facial reproduction techniques. In: Reichs KJ, editor. Forensic osteology: advances in the identification of human remains. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1986; 229-55.