Review of the Development, Validation, and Application of Predictive Instruments in Interventional Cardiology

Heart Disease

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 138-148

  Goldberg Arnold, Renée J ^a,b,c   Akhras, Kasem S ^d   Chen, Connie ^d   Chen, Sheying ^e   Pettit, Krista G ^a   Kaniecki, Diana J ^a,f  

^a Pharmacon International Inc   (United States)

^b LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^d PFIZER INC   (United States)

^e CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^f RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; HUMAN; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0033157279     PISSN: 1521737X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Weintraub WS, Jones EL, Craver JM, Grosswald R, Guyton RA. In-hospital and long-term outcome after reoperative coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1995;92(Suppl):II50-II57.
2. Tan KH, Sulke N, Taub NA, Watts E, Karani S, Sowton E. Determinants of success of coronary angioplasty in patients with a chronic total occlusion: a multiple logistic regression model to improve selection of patients. Br Heart J 1993;70:126-131.
3. Mick MJ, Piedmonte MR, Arnold AM, Simpfendorfer C. Risk stratification for long-term outcome after elective coronary angioplasty: a multivariate analysis of 5,000 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:74-80.
4. Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr, Racz M, Shields E, Chassin MR. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA 1994; 271:761-766.
5. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Strom BL, Lasky WK, The Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Development and valida tion of simplified predictive index for major complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:931-938.
6. Ellis SG, Miller DP, Brown KJ, Omoigui N, Howell GL, Kuther M, Topol EJ. In-hospital cost of percutaneous coronary revascularization critical determinants and implications. Circulation 1995;92:741-747.
7. Ellis SG, Omoigui N, Bittl JA, Lincoff M, Wolfe MW, Howell G, Topol EJ. Analysis and comparison of operator-specific outcomes in interventional cardiology: from a multicenter database of 4860 quality-controlled procedures. Circulation 1996;93:431-439.
8. O'Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, Morton JR, Maloney CT, Nugent WC, The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 1996;275:841-846.
9. Edwards FH, Grover FL, Shroyer AL, Schwartz M, Bero J. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database: current risk assessment. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:903-908.
10. Nugent WC. Clinical applications of risk-assessment protocols in the management of individual patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64(Suppl):S68-S72; discussion S80-S82.
11. Shroyer ALW, Grover FL, Edwards FH. 1995 coronary artery bypass risk model: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac national database. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:879-884.
12. Ghali WA, Quan H, Brant R. Coronary artery bypass grafting in Canada: national and provincial mortality trends, 1992-1995. Can Med Assoc J 1998;159: 25-31.
13. Ghali WA, Quan H, Brant R. Coronary artery bypass grafting in Canada: hospital mortality rates, 1992-1995. Can Med Assoc J 1998;159:926-930.
14. Iezzoni LI, Ash AS, Shwartz M, Landon BE, Mackiernan YD. Predicting in-hospital deaths from coronary artery bypass graft surgery: do different severity measures give different predictions? Med Care 1998;36:28-39.
15. Chen S. Mastering Research: A Guide to the Methods of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers, 1998.
16. Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules: a review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA 1997;277:488-494.
17. Marshall G, Grover FL, Henderson WG, Hammermeister KE. Assessment of predictive models for binary outcomes: an empirical approach using operative death from cardiac surgery. Stat Med 1994;13:1501-1511.
18. Block PC, Peterson EC, Krone R, Kesler K, Hannan E, O'Connor GT, Detre K. Identification of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary interventions: evidence-based guidelines for efficient data collection. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:275-282.
19. Marshall G, Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hammermeister KE. Bayesian-logit model for risk assessment in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57:1492-1500.
20. Dorman BH, Spinale FG, Bailey MK, Kratz JM, Roy RC. Identification of patients at risk for excessive blood loss during coronary artery bypass surgery: thromboelastography versus coagulation screen. Anesth Analg 1993;76:694-700.
21. Lee JS, Bailey MJ, Jeong J, Mauldin PD, Weintraub WS. A study on the cost-effectiveness of coronary revascularization: introducing the simultaneous MIMIC health status model. Health Econ 1997;6:613-623.
22. Lippmann RP, Shahian DM. Coronary artery bypass risk prediction using neural networks. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1635-1643.
23. Tu JV, Weinstein MC, McNeil BJ, Naylor CD, The Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Predicting mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery: what do artificial neural networks learn? Med Decis Making 1998;18:229-235.
24. Budde T, Haude M, Hopp HW, Kerber S, Caspari G, Faßbender G, et al. A prognostic computer modelto predict individual outcome in interventional cardiology: the INTERVENT project. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1611-1619.
25. Laskey W, Boyle J, Johnson LW, The Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Multivariable model for prediction of risk of significant complication during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;30:185-190.
26. Orr RK, Maini BS, Sottile FD, Dumas EM, O'Mara P. A comparison of four severity-adjusted models to predict mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Arch Surg 1995;130:301-306.
27. DeLong ER, Peterson ED, DeLong DM, Muhlbaier LH, Hackett S, Mark DB. Comparing risk-adjustment methods for provider profiling. Stat Med 1997;16: 2645-2664.
28. Edwards FH, Albus RA, Zajtchuk R, Graeber GM, Barry M. A quality assurance model of operative mortality in coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1989; 47:646-649.
29. Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Beck GJ, Lee J-C, Starr NJ, et al. ICU admission score for predicting morbidity and mortality risk after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1050-1058.
30. Geraci JM, Rosen AK, Ash AS, McNiff KJ, Moskowitz MA. Predicting the occurrence of adverse events after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:18-24.
31. Magovern JA, Sakert T, Benckart DH, Burkholder JA, Liebler GA, Magovern GJ Sr. A model for predicting transfusion after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:27-32.
32. Goldberg Arnold RJ, Kotsanos J. Panel 3: methodological issues in conducting pharmacoeconomic evaluation retrospective and claims database studies. Value Health 1999;2:82-87.
33. Ivanov J, Tu JV, Naylor CD. Ready-made, recalibrated, or remodeled? Circulation 1999;99:2098-2104.
34. Glick H, Polsky D. Assessing the generalizability of the results of multinational trials for individual countries participating in the trial. Presented at the Fourth Annual International Meeting of the International Society for Pharmocoeconomics and Outcomes Research. May 23-26, 1999, Crystal City, Virginia.
35. Zenati M, Cohen HA, Holubkov R, Smith AJC, Boujoukos AJ, Caldwell J, et al. Preoperative risk models for minimally invasive coronary bypass: a preliminary study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:584-589.
36. Edwards FH, Cohen AJ, Bellamy RF, Thompson L, Weston L. Risk assessment in urgent/emergent coronary artery surgery. Chest 1990;97:1125-1129.
37. Hartz A, Guse C, Kayser K, Kuhn E, Johnson D. Use of postoperative information to predict mortality rates for patients who have long stays in the intensive care unit after coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Lung 1998;27:22-30.
38. Efron B, Gong G. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, jackknife, and cross-validation. Am Stat 1983;37:36-48.
39. Krumholz HM. Mathematical models and the assessment of performance in cardiology. Circulation 1999;99:2067-2069.
40. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessia S, Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 1997;16:965-980.
41. O'Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, Coffin LH, Morton JR, Maloney CT, and the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1992;85:2110-2118.
42. Bilfinger TV, Conti VR. Blood conservation in coronary artery bypass surgery: prediction with assistance of a computer model. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 37:365-368.
43. Burton JR, Haraphongse M, Hsu L, Kappagoda CT, Rossall RE, Schlaut B. Risk stratification after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 1990;4:687-693.
44. Clark RE. Calculating risk and outcome: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62(Suppl):S2-S5; discussion S31-S32.
45. Dudley RA, Harrell FE Jr, Smith LR, Mark DB, Califf RM, Pryor DB. Comparison of analytic models for estimating the effect of clinical factors on the cost of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:261-271.
46. Edwards FH, Albus RA, Zajtchuk R, Graeber GM, Barry MJ, Rumisek JD. Use of a Bayesian statistical model for risk assessment in coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;45:437-440.
47. Edwards FH, Carey JS, Grover FL, Bero JW, Hartz, RS. Impact of gender on coronary bypass operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:125-131.
48. Edwards FH, Peterson RF, Bridges C, Ceithaml HL. Use of a Bayesian statistical model for risk assessment in coronary artery surgery: updated in 1995. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1611-1612.
49. Ellis SG, Hill CM, Lytle BW. Spectrum of surgical risk for left main coronary stenosis: benchmark for potentially competing percutaneous therapies. Am Heart J 1998;135:335-338.
50. Goldman S, Zadina K, Krasnicka B, Moritz T, Sethi G, Copeland J, Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group No. 297. Predictors of graft patency 3 years after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1563-1568.
51. Grover KL, Shroyer AL, Hammermeister KE. Calculating risk and outcome: the Veterans Affairs database. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62(Suppl):S6-S11; discussion S31-S32.
52. Hannan EL, Arani DT, Johnson LW, Kemp HG, Lukacik G, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State: risk factors and outcomes. JAMA 1992;268:3092-3097.
53. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Rosati RA. Regression modeling strategics for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med 1984;3:143-152.
54. Hermans WR, Foley DP, Rensing BJ, Rutsch W, Heyndrick GR, Danchin N, and the CARPORT and MERCATOR Study Groups. Usefulness of quantitative and qualitative angiographic lesion morphology, and clinical characteristics in predicting major adverse cardiac events during and after native coronary balloon angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:14-20.
55. Hermans WR, Reusing BJ, Foley DP, Tijssen JG, Rutsch W, Emanuelsson H. Patient, lesion, and procedural variables as risk factors for luminal re-narrowing after successful coronary angioplasty: a quantitative analysis in 653 patients with 778 lesions. Multicenter European Research Trial with Cilazapril after Angioplasty. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1993;22(Suppl 4):S45-S57.
56. Hirshfeld JW Jr, Schwartz JS, Jugo R, MacDonald RG, Goldberg S, Savage MP, and the M-HEART Investigators. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: a multivariate statistical model to relate lesion and procedure variables to restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:647-656.
57. Hlatky MA, Califf RM, Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB, Pryor DB. Comparison of predictions based on observational data with the results of randomized controlled clinical trials of coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11:237-245.
58. Hoffmann RG, Blumlein SL, Anderson AJ, Barboriak JJ, Walker JA, Rimm AA. The probability of surviving coronary bypass surgery: five-year results from 1,718 patients. JAMA 1980;243:1341-1344.
59. Iezzoni LI, Shwartz M, Ash AS, Mackiernan YD. Predicting in-hospital mortality for stroke patients: results differ across severity-measurement methods. Med Decis Making 1996;16:348-356.
60. Kaul TK, Fields BL, Riggins LS, Wyatt DA, Jones CR. Ventricular arrhythmia following successful myocardial revascularization: incidence, predictors and prevention. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:629-636.
61. Khan SS, Kupfer JM, Matloff JM, Tsai TP, Nessim S. Interaction of age and preoperative risk factors in predicting operative mortality for coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 1992;86(Suppl):II186-II190.
62. Kuntz RE, Gibson CM, Nobuyoshi M, Baim DS. Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:15-25.
63. Lahey SJ, Borlase BC, Lavin PT, Levitsky S. Preoperative risk factors that predict hospital length of stay in coronary artery bypass patients > 60 years old. Circulation 1992;86(Suppl):II181-II185.
64. Longo KM, Cowen ME, Flaum MA, Valsania P, Schork MA, Wagner LA, Prager RL. Preoperative predictors of cost in Medicare-age patients undergoing coronan artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:740-746.
65. Magovern JA, Sakert T, Magovern GJ, Benckart DH, Burkholder JA, Liebler GA. A model that predicts morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1147-1153.
66. Mantia AM, Brinkmeyer SD, D'Amico F, Ingram M, Ammon J, Canose J. An epidemiologic approach to predictors of elective coronary artery bypass mortality in a non-university hospital population. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1994;8: 263-268.
67. Mauldin PD, Weintraub WS, Becker ER. Predicting hospital costs for first-time coronary artery bypass grafting from preoperative and postoperative variables. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:772-775.
68. McKhann GM, Goldsborough MA, Borowicz LM Jr, Mellits ED, Brookmeyer R, Quaskey SA. Predictors of stroke risk in coronary artery bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:516-521.
69. Newman MF, Wolman R, Kanchuger M, Marschall K, Mora-Mangano C, Roach G, et al. Multicenter preoperative stroke risk index for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1996;94(Suppl):II74-II80.
70. Parsonnet V, Bernstein AD. Development of practical methods for estimating preoperative risk of mortality in cardiac surgery: the New Jersey experience (abstract). Circulation 1996;94:2971.
71. Peduzzi P, Detre K, Murphy ML, Thomsen J, Hultgren H, Takaro T. Ten-year incidence of myocardial infarction and prognosis after infarction: the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Circulation 1991;83:747-755.
72. Preisack MB, Athanasiadis A, Voelker W, Karsch KR. Early luminal deterioration following successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: frequency, prediction and clinical implications. Eur Heart J 1994;15:739-746.
73. Renkin J, Melin J, Robert A, Richelle F, Bachy J-L, Col J, et al. Detection of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: improved clinical decision making with use of a logistic model combining procedural and follow-up variables. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:1333-1340.
74. Rensing BJ, Hermans WR, Vos J, Beatt KJ, Bossuyt P, Rutsch W. and the CARPORT Study Group. Angiographic risk factors of luminal narrowing after coronary balloon angioplasty using balloon measurements to reflect stretch and elastic recoil at the dilation site. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:584-591.
75. Rensing BJ, Hermans WRM, Vos J, Tijssen JGP, Rutch W, Danchin N, et al. Luminal narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a study of clinical, procedural, and lesional factors related to long-term angiographic outcome. Circulation 1993;88:975-985.
76. Savage MP, Goldberg S, Hirshfeld JW, Bass TA, MacDonald RG, Margolis JR. and the M-HEART Investigators. Clinical and angiographic determinants of primary coronary angioplasty success. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:22-28.
77. Sharma SK, Israel DH, Kamean JL, Bodian CA, Ambrose JA. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural determinants of major and minor coronary dissection during angioplasty. Am Heart J 1993;126:39-47.
78. Smith LR, Harrell FE Jr, Rankin JS, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Muhlbaier LH. Determinants of early versus late cardiac death in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1991;84(Suppl):III245-III253.
79. Stahle E, Bergstrom R, Holmberg L, Edlund B, Nystrom SO, Sjogren I. Survival after coronary artery bypass grafting: experience from 4661 patients. Eur Heart J 1994;15:1204-1211.
80. Tu JV, Sykora K, Naylor CD, Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors arc enough? J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1317-1323.
81. van Brussel BL, Plokker HW, Voors AA, Ernst JM, Ernst NM, Knaepen PJ. Multivariate risk factor analysis of clinical outcome 15 years after venous coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Eur Heart J 1995;16:1200-1206.
82. Warner BA. Thoughts and considerations on modeling coronary bypass surgery risk. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1529-1530.
83. Weintraub WS, Kosinski AS, Brown CL, King SB III. Can restenosis after coronary angioplasty be predicted from clinical variables? J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:6-14.
84. Wolfe MW, Roubin GS, Schweiger M, Isner JM, Ferguson JJ, Cannon AD, and the Heparin Registry Investigators. Length of hospital stay and complications after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: clinical and procedural predictors. Circulation 1995;92:311-319.