Comment on analyzing flow cytometric data for comparison of mean values of the coefficient of variation of the G1 peak

Cytometry

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 112-116

  Misra, R K ^b   Easton, Michael D L ^a  

^a International EcoGen Inc   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Coefficient of variation; Flow cytometric data; Weighted least squares

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G0 PHASE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL POPULATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ERYTHROCYTES; FLOW CYTOMETRY; G1 PHASE; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; SALMON;

EID: 0033152989     PISSN: 01964763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19990601)36:2<112::AID-CYTO4>3.0.CO;2-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bickham JW, Sawin VL, Burton DW, McBee K. Flow-cytometric analysis of the effects of triethylenemelamine on somatic and testicular tissues on the rat. Cytometry 1992;13:368-373.
2. Custer TW, Bickham JW, Lyne TB, Lewis T, Ruedas LA, Custer CM, Melancon MJ. Flow cytometry for monitoring contaminant exposure in black-crowned night-herons. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1994;27: 176-179.
3. Irons RD, Stillman WS. Toxicology of the blood and bone marrow. New York: Raven Press; 1985.
4. Otto FJ, Oldiges H. Flow cytogenetic studies in chromosomes and whole cells for the detection of clastogenic effects. Cytometry 1980;1:13-17.
5. Bickham JW, Hanks BG, Smolen MJ, Lamb T, Gibbons JW. Flow cytometric analysis of the effects of low-level radiation exposure on natural populations of slider turtles (Pseudemys scripta). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1988;17:837-841.
6. Easton MDL, Kruzynski GM, Solar II, Dye HM. An investigation into the genetic toxicity of pulp mill effluent on juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) using flow cytometry. Wat Sci Tech 1997;35:347-355.
7. McBee K, Bickham JW. Petrochemical-related DNA damage in wild rodents detected by flow cytometry. Bull Environ Contain Toxicol 1988;40:343-349.
8. Otto FJ, Oldiges H, Gohde W, Jain VK. Flow cytometric measurement of nuclear DNA content variations as a potential in vitro mutagenicity test. Cytometry 1981;2:189-191.
9. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry, 2nd ed. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1981.
10. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1988.
11. Kendall MG, Stuart A. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. 1. London: Charles Griffin & Company; 1958.
12. Amitage P. Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford and Edinburgh: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1971.
13. Li JCR. Statistical inference, Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Edwards Brothers; 1965.
14. Misra RK, Uthe JF, Vyncke W. A weighted procedure of analyzing for time trends in the contaminant levels in CMP data: application to code and flounder data of the Belgian coast (1978-1985). J Cons Int Explor Mer 1990;47:65-75.
15. Misra RK. A multivariate procedure for comparing mean vectors for populations with unequal regression coefficient and residual covariance matrices. Biom J 1996;38:415-424.
16. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. Applied linear statistical methods, 2nd ed. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin; 1985.
17. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1960.
18. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
19. Jobson JD. Applied multivariate statistical analysis, Vol. II. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992.
20. Bliss CI. Statistics in biology, Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1970.