Anatomy of the two subdisciplines of communication study

Human Communication Research

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 618-631

  Rogers, Everett M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033149174     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00465.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barnett, G. A., & Danowski, J. A. (1992). The structure of communication: A network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 19, 264-285.
2. Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3. Campbell, D. J. (1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 328-348). Chicago: Aldine.
4. Cohen, J., & Metzger, M. (1998). Social affiliation and the achievement of ontological security through interpersonal and mass communication. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 15, 41-60.
5. Gumpert, G., & Cathcart, R. (Eds.) (1982). Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Hickson, M., Stacks, D. W., & Amsbary, J. H. (1989). An analysis of prolific scholarship in speech communication, 1915-1985: Toward a yardstick for measuring research productivity. Communication Education, 38, 231-236.
7. Kau, J. B., & Johnason, L. L. (1983). Regional science programs: A ranking based on publication performance. Journal of Regional Science, 23, 177-186.
8. Mohammed, S. N. (1998). An analysis of research methodologies in 15 major communication journals from 1987 to 1996 (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59.
9. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
10. Paisley, W. (1984). Communication in the communication sciences. In B. Dervin, & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 1-43). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Reardon, K. K., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Interpersonal versus mass media communication: A false dichotomy. Human Communication Research, 15, 284-303.
12. Reeves, B., & Borgman, C. L. (1983). A bibliometric evaluation of core journals in communication research. Human Communication Research, 10, 119-136.
13. Rice, R. E., Borgman, C. L., & Reeves, B. (1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977-1985: Cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research, 15, 256-283.
14. Rogers, E. M. (1994). A history of communication study: A biographical approach. New York: Free Press.
15. Rogers, E. M. (1998). When the media have strong effects: Intermedia processes. In J. Trent (Ed.), Communication: Views from the helm for the twenty-first century (pp. 276-285). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Rogers, E. M., & Chaffee, S. H. (1994). Communication and journalism from "Daddy" Bleyer to Wilbur Schramm: A palimpsest. Journalism Monographs, 147.
17. Rubin, A. M., & Rubin, R. C. (1985). Interface of personal and mediated communication: A research agenda. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2, 36-53.
18. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
19. So, C.Y.K. (1988). Citation patterns of core communication journals: An assessment of the developmental status of communication. Human Communication Research, 15, 236-255.
20. Vincent, R. C. (1991). Telecommunications research productivity of U.S. communication programs: 1984-1989. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 840-851.