Sensory median/radial latency difference versus routine conduction studies in 1059 carpal tunnel syndrome hands (668 cases);Síndrome do túnel do carpo correlação da comparação de latência sensitiva mediano-radial com condução nervosa rotina em 1059 mãos (668 casos)

Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Volumn 57, Issue 2 A, 1999, Pages 208-215

  Kouyoumdjian, João Aris ^a,b  

^a Faculdade de Medicina   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Carpal tunnel syndrome; Compression neuropathy; Median nerve; Mononeuropathy; Nerve conduction study

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDIAN NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE CONDUCTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDIAN NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL CONDUCTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0033146012     PISSN: 0004282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x1999000200008     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Dawson DM, Hallett M, Millender LH. Entrapment neuropathies. 2Ed.. Boston: Little Brown, 1990.
2. American Academy of Neuroloy. Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 1993;43:2406-2409.
3. American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 1993;43:2404-2405.
4. Jablecki CK, Andary MT, So YT, Wilkins DE, Willians FH. Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:1392-1414.
5. Ross MA, Kimura J. The carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:567-573.
6. Parry GJG. Pathophysiological mechanisms in peripheral nerve injury. American Association of Electrodianostic Medicine. Plenary Session: Physical trauma to peripheral nerves, Minneapolis. 1996;7-13.
7. Simovic D, Weinberg DH. Terminal latency index in the carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1997;20:1178-1180.
8. Johnson EW, Kukla RD, Wongsam PE, Piedmont A. Sensory latencies to the ring finger: normal values and ralation to carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1981;62:206-208.
9. Kimura J. The carpal tunnel syndrome: localization of conduction abnormalities within the distal segment of the median nerve. Brain 1979;102:619-635.
10. Nathan PA, Meadows KD, Doyle LS. Sensory segmental latency values of the median nerve for a population of normals individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:499-501.
11. Nathan PA, Srinivasan H, Doyle LS, Meadows KD. Location of impaired sensory conduction of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1990;15:89-92.
12. Sheean GL, Houser MK, Murray NMF. Lumbrical-interosseus latency comparison in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;97:285-289.
13. Vogt T, Mika A, Thömke F, Hopf HC. Evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1997;20:153-157.
14. Uncini A, Muzio A, Awad J, Manente G, Tafuro M, Gambi D. Sensitivity of three median-to-ulnar comparative tests in diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:1366-1373.
15. Hennessey WJ, Falco FJE, Braddom RL, Goldberg G. The influence of age on distal latency comparisons in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1994;17:1215-1217.
16. Andary MT, Fankhauser MJ, Ritson JL, et al., Comparison of sensory mid-palm studies to other techniques in carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996;36:279-285.
17. Carrol GJ. Comparison of median and radial nerve sensory latencies in the electrophysiological diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987;68:101-106.
18. Johnson EW, Sipski M, Lammertse T. Median and radial sensory latencies to digit: 1. Normal values and usefulness in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:140-141.
19. Jackson DA, Clifford JC. Electrodiagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:199-204.
20. Ghavanini MRA, Kazemi B, Jazayeri M, Khosrawi S. Median-radial sensory latencies comparison as a new test in carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996;36:171-173.
21. Cioni R, Passero S, Paradiso C, Gianinni F, Battistini N, Rushworth G. Diagnostic specificity of sensory and motor nerve conduction variables in early detection of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol 1989;236:208-213.
22. Lesser EA, Venkatesh S, Preston DC, Logigian EL. Stimulation distal to the lesion in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:503-507.
23. Kothari MJ, Rutkove SB, Caresss JB, Hinchey J, Logigian E L, Preston DC. Comparison of digital sensory studies in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:1272-1276.
24. Kouyoumdjian JA. Sensory median/radial latency difference versus routine conduction studies in 794 carpal tunnel syndrome hands (Abstract). Muscle Nerve 1995;18:1059-1060.