The NAACP legal defense fund and the U.S. Supreme Court's racial discrimination decision making

Social Science Quarterly

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 325-340

  Tauber, Steven C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033145464     PISSN: 00384941     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abraham, Henry J. 1992. Justices and Presidents: A Political History of Appointment to the Supreme Court. 3d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Caldeira, Gregory A., and John R. Wright. 1988. "Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court." American Political Science Review 82:1109-1127.
3. -. 1990. "Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much?" Journal of Politics 52:782-806.
4. Caplan, Lincoln. 1987. The Tenth Justice. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
5. Cortner, Richard. 1968. "Strategies and Tactics of Litigants in Constitutional Cases." Journal of Public Law 17:287-307.
6. DeMaris, Alfred. 1992. Logit Modeling: Practical Applications. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, no. 07-086. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
7. Epstein, Lee. 1985. Conservatives in Court. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
8. Epstein, Lee, and Joseph Kobylka. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
9. Epstein, Lee, and C. K. Rowland. 1991. "Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts." American Political Science Review 85:205-217.
10. George, Tracy E., and Lee Epstein. 1992. "On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making." American Political Science Review 86:323-337.
11. Greenberg, Jack. 1959. Race Relations and American Law. New York: Columbia University Press.
12. -1994. Crusaders in the Court: How a Dedicated Band of Lawyers Fought for the Civil Rights Revolution. New York: Basic Books.
13. Hardy, Melissa. 1993. Regression with Dummy Variables. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, no. 07-072. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
14. Ivers, Gregg. 1995. To Build a Wall: American Jews and the Separation of Church and State. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
15. Jaccard, James, Robert Turrisi, and Choi K. Wan. 1990. Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, no. 07-093. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
16. Kaufman, Robert. L. 1996. "Comparing Effects in Dichotomous Logistic Regression: A Variety of Standardized Coefficients." Social Science Quarterly 77:90-109.
17. Kluger, Richard. 1976. Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
18. Kobylka, Joseph F. 1987. "A Court-Created Context for Group Litigation: Libertarian Groups and Obscenity." Journal of Politics 49:1061-1078.
19. Krislov, Samuel. 1963. "The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy." Yale Law Journal 72:694-721.
20. Kuersten, Ashlyn K., and Donald B. Songer. 1994. "Political Disadvantage Theory and Amicus Curiae Participation in Southern State Supreme Courts." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, Ga.
21. Manwaring, David R. 1962. Render unto Caesar: The Flag Salute Controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. McGuire, Kevin T., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1993. "Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Suprem: Court." American Political Science Review 87:717-726.
23. Meltsner, Michael. 1973. Cruel and Unusual: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment. New York: Random House.
24. NAACP Legal Defense Fund. 1989. 1988-1989 Annual Report. New York: Legal Defense Fund.
25. -. 1990. 1989-1990 Annual Report. New York: Legal Defense Fund.
26. -. 1991. 1990-1991 Annual Report. New York: Legal Defense Fund.
27. O'Connor, Karen. 1980. Women's Organizations' Use of the Court. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
28. O'Connor, Karen, and Lee Epstein. 1982. "Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation: An Appraisal of Hackman's Folklore." Law and Society Review 16:701-711.
29. -. 1984. "A Legal Voice for the Chicano Community: The Activities of the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, 1968-1982." Social Science Quarterly 65:245-256.
30. Olson, Susan E. 1990. "Interest Group Litiga ion in Federal District Court: Beyond the Political Disadvantage Theory." Journal of Politics 52:854-882.
31. Pritchett, C. Herman. [1948] 1963. The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values, 1937-1947. New York: Octagon Books.
32. Rohde, David W., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
33. Rumble, Wilfrid. 1968. American Legal Realism: Skepticism, Reform, and the Judicial Process. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
34. Salokar, Rebecca. 1992. The Solicitor General: The Politics of Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
35. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1984. "Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962-1981." American Political Science Review 78:891-900.
36. -. 1988. "Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts." Western Political Quarterly 41:137-152.
37. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D. Cover. 1989. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices." American Political Science Review 83:557-565.
38. Segal, Jeffrey A., Lee Epstein, Charles Cameron, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1995. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Justices Revisited." Journal of Politics 57:812-823.
39. Segal Jeffrey A., and Cheryl D. Reedy. 1988. "The Supreme Court and Sex Discrimination: The Role of the Solicitor General." Western Political Quarterly 41:553-568.
40. Segal, Jeffrey A., Donald R. Songer, and Charles M. Cameron. 1995. "Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals." Pp. 227-245 in Lee Epstein, ed., Contemplating Courts. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
41. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42. Sheehan, Reginald S., William Mishler, and Donald Songer. 1992. "Ideology, Status, and the Differential Success of Direct Parties before the Supreme Court." American Political Science Review 86:464-474.
43. Songer, Donald R., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Charles M. Cameron. 1994. "The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Theory of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interaction." American Journal of Political Science 38:673-696.
44. Stewart, Joseph Jr., and James F. Sheffield, Jr. 1987. "Does Interest Group Litigation Matter? The Case of Black Political Mobilization in Mississippi." Journal of Politics 49:780-798.
45. Tate, C. Neal. 1981. "Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946-1978." American Political Science Review 75:355-367.
46. Tate, C. Neal, and Roger Handberg. 1991. "Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior." American Journal of Political Science 35:460-480.
47. Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
48. Tushnet, Mark V. 1987. The NAACP's Legal Strategy against Segregated Education, 1925-1950. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
49. Vose, Clement E. 1958. "Litigation as a Form of Pressure Group Activity." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 319:20-31.
50. -. 1959. Caucasians Only: The Supreme Court, the NAACP, and the Restrictive Covenant Cases. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
51. Wasby, Stephen L. 1995. Race Relations Litigation in an Age of Complexity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.