Scintigraphic, sonographic, and histologic evaluation of renal autotransplantation in cats

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 775-779

  Newell, Susan M ^a   Ellison, Gary W ^a   Graham, John P ^a   Ginn, Pamela E ^a   Lanz, Otto I ^a,c   Harrison, Jay M ^b   Smith, Jeffrey S ^a   Van Gilder, James M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA MARYLAND REGIONAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BIOPSY; CAT; CYTOLOGY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SCINTISCANNING; TIME;

ANIMALS; BIOPSY; CATS; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 0033144747     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Delaney V, Ling BN, Campbell WG, et al. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration biopsy, Doppler ultrasound, and radionuclide scintigraphy in the diagnosis of acute allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients: sensitivity, specificity, and cost analysis. Nephron 1993;63:263-272.
2. Mathews KG, Gregory CR. Renal transplants in cats: 66 cases (1987-1996). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997;211:1432-1436.
3. Allen KS, Jorkasky DK, Arger PH, et al. Renal allografts: prospective analysis of Doppler sonography. Radiology 1988;169: 371-376.
4. Rigsby CM, Burns PN, Weltin GG, et al. Doppler signal quantification in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1987;162:39-42.
5. Swobodnik WL, Spohn BE, Wechsler JG, et al. Real-time ultrasound evaluation of renal transplant failure during the early postoperative period. Ultrasound Med Biol 1986;12:97-105.
6. Buckley AR, Cooperberg PL, Reeve CE, et al. The distinction between acute renal transplant rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity: value of duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:521-525.
7. Fleischer AC, Hinton AA, Glick AD, et al. Duplex Doppler sonography of renal transplants - correlation with histopathology. J Ultrasound Med 1989;8:89-94.
8. Genkins SM, Sanfilippo FP, Carroll BA. Duplex Doppler sonography of renal transplants: lack of sensitivity in establishing pathologic diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:535-539.
9. Don S, Kopecky KK, Filo RS, et al. Duplex Doppler US of renal allografts: causes of elevated resistive index. Radiology 1989;171:709-712.
10. Pozniak MA, Dodd GD, Kelcz E Ultrasonographic evaluation of renal transplantation. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:1053-1066.
11. Nyland TG, Fisher PE, Gregory CR, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of renal size in dogs with acute allograft rejection. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1997;38:55-61.
12. Berland LL, Lawson TL, Adams MB. Evaluation of canine renal transplants with pulsed Doppler duplex sonography. J Surg Res 1985;39:433-438.
13. Pozniak MA, Kelcz F, D'Alessandro A, et al. Sonography of renal transplants in dogs: the effects of acute tubular necrosis, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, and acute rejection on resistive index and renal length. Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:791-797.
14. 31P-MRS: experimental study in canines. Am J Surg 1993;59:182-187.
15. Rivers BJ, Walter PA, O'Brien TD, et al. Duplex Doppler estimation of pourcelot resistive index in arcuate arteries of sedated normal cats. J Vet Intern Med 1996;10:28-33.
16. 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. Am J Vet Res 1992;53:1101-1107.
17. Gregory CR. Renal transplantation in cats. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1993;15:1325-1339.
18. Solez K, Axelson RA, Benediktsson H, et al. International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int 1993;44:411-422.
19. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements through release 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 1996.
20. Shah AN. Radionuclide imaging in organ transplantation. Radiol Clin North Am 1995;33:473-496.
21. Dubovsky EV, Russell CD. Radionuclide evaluation of renal transplants. Semin Nucl Med 1988;18:181-198.
22. Perchik JE, Baumgartner BR, Bernadino ME. Renal transplant rejection-limited value of duplex Doppler sonography. Invest Radiol 1991;26:422-426.
23. Rivers BJ, Walter PA, Polzin DJ, et al. Duplex Doppler estimation of intrarenal pourcelot resistive index in dogs and cats with renal disease. J Vet Intern Med 1997;11:250-260.
24. Morrow KL, Salman MD, Lappin MR, et al. Comparison of the resistive index to clinical parameters in dogs with renal disease. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1996;37:193-199.
25. Nyland TG, Fisher PE, Doverspike M, et al. Diagnosis of urinary tract obstruction in dogs using duplex Doppler ultrasonography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1993;34:348-352.
26. Yeager AE, Anderson WI. Study of association between histologic features and echogenicity of architecturally normal cat kidneys. Am J Vet Res 1989;50:860-863.