Sex, complexity, and preferences for residential facades

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 88, Issue 3 PART 2, 1999, Pages 1301-1312

  Stamps III, Arthur E ^a  

^a Institute of Environmental Quality   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARCHITECTURE; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; VISION;

ADULT; AGED; ARCHITECTURE; ENVIRONMENT; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEX FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033144697     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.88.3.1301-1312     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ALTMAN, I., & CHURCHMAN, A. (Eds.) (1994) Women and the environment. New York: Plenum.
2. BERLYNE, D. E. (1960) Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. BERLYNE, D. E. (Ed.) (1974) Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: steps towards an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. New York: Wiley.
4. BERLYNE, D. E. (1980) Psychological aesthetics. In H. C. Triandis & W. Lonner (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: basic processes. Vol. 3. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Pp. 323-361.
5. BERLYNE, D. E., & MADSEN, K. B. (Eds.) (1973) Pleasure, reward, preference. New York: Academic Press.
6. BERNALDEZ, F. G., & ABELLO, R. P. (1989) Environmental challenge and environmental preference: age and sex effects. Journal of Environmental Management, 28, 53-70.
7. BIRNBAUM, M. H. (1998) Measurement, judgment, and decision making. (2nd ed.) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. BURDICK, R. K., & GRAYBILL, F. A. (1992) Confidence intervals on variance components. New York: Marcel Dekker.
9. CARP, F., & CARP, A. (1982) Perceived environmental quality of neighborhoods: development of assessment scales and their relation to age and gender. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2, 295-312.
10. COHEN, J., & COHEN, P. (1993) Applied regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. GUILFORD, J. P. (1954) Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. HEDGES, L. V., & OLKIN, I. (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
13. IMAMOGLU, C. (1998) Evaluations of house facade drawings in relation to their level of complexity. St. Louis, Missouri: 29th Annual Meeting of the Environmental Design Research Association.
14. KRIER, R. (1988) Architectural composition. New York: Rizzoli.
15. LYONS, E. (1983) Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environment and Behavior, 15, 487-511.
16. MACIA, A. (1979) Visual perception of landscapes: sex and personality differences. Our national landscape: a conference on applied techniques for analysis and management of the visual resource. (General Technical Report PSW-35, 279-285)
17. MCALESTER, V., & MCALESTER, L. (1995) A field guide to American houses. New York: Knopf.
18. NASAR, J. L. (1989) The effect of sign complexity and coherence on the perceived quality of retail scenes. In J. L. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 300-320.
19. NASAR, J. L., & KANG, J. (1989) A post-jury evaluation: the Ohio State University design competition for a center for the visual arts. Environment and Behavior, 21, 464-484.
20. NEWELL, P. (1997) A cross-cultural examination of favorite places. Environment and Behavior, 29, 495-514.
21. PENNING-ROWSELL, E. C. (1982) A public preference evaluation of landscape quality. Regional Studies, 16, 97-112.
22. ROSENTHAL, R. (1991) Meta-analytic procedures for social research. (2nd ed.) Vol. 6. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. ROSENTHAL, R., & ROSNOW, R. L. (1991) Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. SEARLE, S. R., CASELLA, G., & MCCULLOCH, C. E. (1992) Variance components. New York: Wiley.
25. SEXTON, R. (1995) Parallel utopias: the quest for community. San Francisco, CA: Chronicle Books.
26. STAMPS, A. E. (1991) Public preferences for high rise buildings: stylistic and demographic effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 839-844.
27. STAMPS, A. E. (1993a) Public preferences for residences: precode, code minimum, and avantgarde architectural styles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 99-103.
28. STAMPS, A. E. (1993b) Simulation effects on environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Management, 38, 115-132.
29. STAMPS, A. E. (1994) Formal and nonformal stimulus factors in environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 3-9.
30. STAMPS, A. E. (1995) Stimulus and respondent factors in environmental preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 668-670.
31. STAMPS, A. E. (1996a) Effect sizes as a lingua franca of environmental aesthetics. In J. L. Nasar & B. Brown (Eds.), Public and private spaces: EDRA 27. Salt Lake City, UT. Edmond, OK: Environmental Design Research Association. Pp. 151-162.
32. STAMPS, A. E. (1996b) People and places: variance components of environmental preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 323-334.
33. STAMPS, A. E. (1997a) Advances in peer review research: an introduction. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(1), 3-10.
34. STAMPS, A. E. (1997b) Meta-analysis in environmental research. In M. S. Amiel & T. C. Vischer (Eds.), Space design and management for place making: proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Environmental Design Research Association. Montreal, Canada. Edmond, OK: Environmental Design Research Association. Pp. 114-124.
35. STAMPS, A. E. (1997c) Of time and preference: temporal stability of environmental preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 883-896.
36. STAMPS, A. E. (1997d) A paradigm for distinguishing significant from nonsignificant visual impacts: theory, implementation, case histories. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 17, 249-293.
37. STAMPS, A. E. (1997e) Using a dialectical scientific brief in peer review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(1), 85-98.
38. STAMPS, A. E. (1998a) Complexity of architectural facades: from vague impressions to definite design features. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 1407-1417.
39. STAMPS, A. E. (1998b) Effect sizes of mountains and molehills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 913-914.
40. STAMPS, A. E. (1999) Architectural detail, van der Laan Septaves, and pixel counts. Design Studies, 20, 83-97.
41. STAMPS, A. E., & NASAR, J. L. (1997) Design review and public preferences: effects of geographical locations, public consensus, sensation seeking, and architectural styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 11-32.
42. STRUMSE, E. (1996) Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in Western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 17-31.
43. VAN DER LAAN, H. (1983) Architectonic space: fifteen lessons on the disposition of the human habitat. (Padovan, R., Transl.) Leiden, The Netherlands: E. J. Brill.
44. WINER, B. J., BROWN, D. R., & MICHELS, K. M. (1991) Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. YI, Y. K. (1992) Affect and cognition interface in aesthetic experiences of landscapes. College Station, TX: Texas A & M Univer.
46. ZUBE, E. H., VINING, J., LAW, C., & BECHTEL, R. B. (1985) Perceived urban residential quality. Environment and Behavior, 17, 327-350.