Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of cystic tumor of the pancreas compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and computed tomography

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 294-298

  Mera, Kiyomi ^a   Tajiri, Hisao ^a   Muto, Manabu ^a   Ohtsu, Atushi ^a   Furuse, Junji ^a   Maru, Yasushi ^a   Kinoshita, Taira ^a   Ryu, Munemasa ^a   Nawano, Shigeru ^a   Murakami, Kouji ^a   Moriyama, Noriyuki ^b   Yoshida, Shigeaki ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL EAST   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cystic tumor of the pancreas; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOMA; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CYSTADENOMA; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUCOCELE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA, PAPILLARY; ADENOMA; AGED; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CYSTADENOMA, SEROUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUCOCELE; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC DUCTS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0033142956     PISSN: 03682811     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/29.6.294     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Oi I. ERCP imaging. Pancreas 1998;16:402-7.
2. Yoshimori M, Tajiri H, Nakamura K, Ozaki H. Diagnosis of small carcinoma of the pancreas: importance of ultrasound scanning and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Jpn J Clin Oncol 1984;14:359-68.
3. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Freidrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography with a heavily T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991;181:805-8.
4. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Clarke P, Siegenberg D, Chuttani R, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995;196:459-64.
5. Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Toyama N, Kodaira N, Yamamoto H, Tatami M, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology 1994;192:73-8.
6. Adamek HE, Weitz M, Breer H, Jakobs R, Schilling D, Reimann JF. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 1997;29:741-4.
7. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996;110:589-97.
8. Hintze RE, Adler A, Veitzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H, Hammerstigel R, Vogl T, et al. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 1997;29:182-7.
9. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci J. MR cholangiography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 1996;199:91-8.
10. Japan Pancreas Society. General Rules for the Study of Pancreatic Cancer, 4th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan, 1993 (English edition, 1996).
11. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, Broglia L, Massina A, Scipioni A, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 0.5 T: technique optimisation and preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1996;6:147-52.
12. Miyazaki T, Tamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, Yamamoto H, Urata J, Takahashi M. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (Half-Fourier Acquisition Single-Shot Turbo Spin-Echo) sequences. Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:1297-303.
13. Laubenberger J, Buchert M, Schneider B, Blum U, Hennig J, Langer M. Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance pancreaticography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:18-23.
14. Reinhold C, Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:1285-95.
15. Chan Y, Chan A, Lam W, Lee D, Chung S, Sung J, et al. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996;200:85-9.
16. Barish M, Soto J, Ferrucci J. Magnetic resonance pancreatography. Endoscopy 1997;29:487-95.
17. Bret PM, Reinhold C. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1997;29:472-86.
18. Onaya H, Itai Y, Niitsu M, Chiba T, Michishita N, Saida Y. Ductectalic mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:171-7.
19. Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H, Kitano S, Ono Wataru, Onishi H, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography and MR urography: improved enhancement with a negative oral contrast agent. Radiology 1997;203:281-5.
20. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, Nicaise N, Braude P, Yperen GV, et al. Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 1997;203:435-41.
21. Takehara Y, Ichijoo K, Tooyama N, Kodaira N, Fujiwara T, Yamamoto H, et al. Enhanced delineation of the pancreatic duct in MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a combined use of secretin. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 1995;55:255-6 (in Japanese).
22. De Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, Gense V, Oui B, Beyssac R, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance cholangiography for the common bile duct stones: preliminary results of a prospective controlled study. Hepatology 1996;199:99-103.