|
Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 160-165
|
Visual acuity screening versus noncycloplegic autorefraction screening for astigmatism in Native American preschool children.
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CYCLOPENTOLATE;
MYDRIATIC AGENT;
AMERICAN INDIAN;
ARTICLE;
ASTIGMATISM;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DRUG EFFECT;
ECONOMICS;
EYE REFRACTION;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;
PRESCHOOL CHILD;
PUPIL;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SPECTACLES;
UNITED STATES;
VISION TEST;
VISUAL ACUITY;
ARIZONA;
ASTIGMATISM;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
CYCLOPENTOLATE;
EYEGLASSES;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN;
MALE;
MYDRIATICS;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
PUPIL;
REFRACTION, OCULAR;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
VISION SCREENING;
VISUAL ACUITY;
|
EID: 0033142870
PISSN: 10918531
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S1091-8531(99)70062-5 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (36)
|
References (0)
|